Nursery admission: Management quota prone to misuse, Delhi govt to HC
The Delhi government on Wednesday told the high court that management quota for nursery admissions in private schools was ‘inherently prone to misuse’, which led it to step in and scrap it.education Updated: Feb 10, 2016 19:30 IST
The Delhi government on Wednesday told the high court that management quota for nursery admissions in private schools was ‘inherently prone to misuse’, which led it to step in and scrap it.
The submission was made in response to a query by a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath as to how private unaided schools can be restrained from exercising management quota when they are entitled to it, under a 2007 order of the Lieutenant Governor. “When there is something inherently prone to misuse, state as regulator can say don’t do it. Management quota is a criterion which is prone to misuse,” said the Delhi government.
Private unaided schools contended that the Delhi government’s January 6 order scrapping the management quota was not issued by the LG or under any statute, and ‘ran foul’ of the LG’s 2007 order.
After hearing arguments of both sides, the bench reserved its verdict on the government’s plea challenging a single judge order of the high court staying the scrapping of the management quota and certain other criteria.
While reserving its verdict, the court observed that due to shortage of good schools in Delhi, people were being forced to go to Noida where it was easier to get admission.
During the hearing, the court said the government would have to show that private unaided schools were indulging in commercialisation and profiteering by way of the management quota and asked the basis for such allegation.
The government said it has received complaints from several parents that some schools have demanded capitation fees. These complaints were placed before the single-judge who in turn asked the government to take action.
The government said it has issued show cause notices to some schools which had indulged in such activity.
The government said that there were “inherent contradictions” in the entire approach of the single-judge who had passed the February 4 interim order in which he had also given a prima facie view that the January 6 decision was taken without any authority of law.