New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Aug 19, 2019-Monday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

Monday, Aug 19, 2019

HC to IT dept: Additional tax demand without serving notice invalid

The High Court directed the IT dept to release the attachments on the petitioner’s bank accounts.

india Updated: Jul 29, 2019 06:39 IST
K A Y Dodhiya
K A Y Dodhiya
Hindustan Times, Mumbai
HC gave the order while hearing the petition of a woman, a senior citizen who was asked to pay additional taxes for assessment year 2011-12. The court was informed she was not aware of the reopening of her case.
HC gave the order while hearing the petition of a woman, a senior citizen who was asked to pay additional taxes for assessment year 2011-12. The court was informed she was not aware of the reopening of her case.(Bhushan Koyande)
         

If the Income Tax (IT) department asks you to pay additional tax for a previous assessment year without serving notice to you beforehand, such additional tax demands are invalid,the Bombay high court has said.

The HC gave the order while hearing the petition of a woman, a senior citizen who was asked to pay additional taxes for assessment year 2011-12. The court was informed she was not aware of the reopening of her case. The IT department said they had tried to inform the woman but after they failed, they passed an ex-parte order and also froze her bank accounts. The division bench of justices Akil Kureshi and SJ Kathawalla was hearing the petition filed by the woman through advocate Anupam Dighe. It was submitted that the woman is a widow and after the death of her husband, she had moved to Jabalpur.

Dighe told the court that though the woman had a PAN card, as she was a housewife she never filed returns. Hence, when her bank accounts were frozen she inquired with the bank and was informed that it was done at the behest of the IT department. However, the IT department submitted there had been high-value transactions in the woman’s account in the year 2011-12 and as there was escaped income, they had decided to assess the tax liability. The counsel said notices were issued to the woman at the residential address mentioned in her PAN card but they had been returned. The counsel said that during reassessment the officer concerned had again issued notice to the woman but they had been returned too.

Dighe pointed out that as per the Income Tax Act, notice had to be served on the assessee before the officer could proceed with the assessment, which was never done. In light of the rules of serving notices and summons as mentioned in the Act, the HC said, “Reopening of assessment was invalid. No valid assessment thereon could have been framed.”

First Published: Jul 29, 2019 06:39 IST

more from india