‘Include women in adultery law’
Women, too, should be brought under the purview of section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which penalises adultery, the Bombay high court said on Thursday, while hearing a plea on the validity of the law.cities Updated: Dec 06, 2017 19:38 IST
Note: The Mumbai-based businessman, who had lodged a complaint in this case against Worli resident, later withdrew it and the matter was settled amicably between the two individuals. Further, the additional chief metropolitan magistrate of the Dadar court accepted the plea to settle the matter amicably.
Women, too, should be brought under the purview of section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, which penalises adultery, the Bombay high court said on Thursday, while hearing a plea on the validity of the law.
The court was hearing a petition filed by a Worli resident, who challenged the section on grounds that it was outdated.
He faces prosecution for allegedly having an affair with a married woman.
According to section 497 of the IPC, any man, married or unmarried, who engages in a physical relationship with a married woman, is guilty of adultery and faces imprisonment of up to five years, fine, or both. The woman, however, is immune from prosecution under the provision.
The division bench of justice BH Marlapalle and justice UD Salvi said, “If your challenge is accepted, there would be no civil society left. In fact, there is a need to amend the proviso in order to bring women under its purview as well.”
“If two adults want to have consensual sex, they are free to do so, but they should remain outside the institution of marriage,” the judges said.
“The offence of adultery has been incorporated in the IPC in 1872, based on the morality of society 140 years ago,” the petition filed by 40-year-old states. He said the changing morality of society could be gauged from the fact that live-in relationships are now recognised.
He also said the right to have physical relations with a consenting party comes from the Right to Life guaranteed by the Constitution of India. According to him, “Such a natural and basic instinct can’t be made punishable, so long as it is within the confines of public order and decency.”
His arguments, however, failed to impress the judges, who said that an adulterous life could not be led within the limits of the institution of marriage.
On July 1, 2009, a city-based businessman had lodged a complaint against the Worli resident alleging that he had an affair with his wife.
Acting on the complaint, additional chief metropolitan magistrate of the Dadar court issued a process against the Worli resident on October 15, 2009.