Sign in

‘BJP doing Twitter politics,’ counsel of Udhayanidhi tells Madras high court on Sanatana row

The proceedings of the case are being misreported on social media, including by Tamil Nadu BJP president K Annamalai, the counsel said

Updated on: Nov 1, 2023, 06:56:16 IST
By , Chennai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is playing “Twitter politics” on the basis of the case filed by the Hindu Munnani group against Tamil Nadu’s sports minister Udhayanidhi Stalin over his Sanatana Dharma comment, said senior counsel P Wilson in the Madras high court on Tuesday.

Udhayanidhi Stalin (ANI)
Udhayanidhi Stalin (ANI)

The proceedings of the case are being misreported on social media, including by Tamil Nadu’s BJP president K Annamalai, the senior counsel, appearing for Udhayanidhi Stalin, added.

Wilson orally made the above submission when the writ of quo warranto (challenging one’s right to hold a public office) filed by T Manohar, an office bearer of right wing Hindu Munnani, against Udhayanidhi Stalin came up for hearing before Justice Anita Sumanth.

Earlier in September, Tamil Nadu chief minister MK Stalin’s son Udhayanidhi Stalin set off a political storm sparring with senior BJP leaders over his comment that Sanatana Dharma must be eradicated like malaria and dengue. Several police cases were filed against Udhayanidhi across the country over his comment and there was even a bounty on his head.

When the court sought a copy of Udhayanidhi’s speech, his senior counsel submitted that it is the duty of the petitioner, who filed a writ petition, to submit necessary evidence and “failure to do so should entail in dismissal of the writ petition.” He argued that the court cannot compel the respondent to do anything against his constitutional right.

In his affidavit, Udhayanidhi had said that he has not breached his oath of office by holding a viewpoint on caste hegemony, preaching for equality and eradication of discrimination. “A certain ideology which is opposed to Dravidian ideology is attempting to use the court’s process to settle political and social questions,” Udhayanidhi’s affidavit read. “Where the Dravidian ideology speaks of self-respect, equality, rational thought and brotherhood, the opposing sect speaks of division on the basis of caste.”

Another senior DMK leader and MP A Raja, who backed Udhyanidhi’s comments and has also been named in the case, sought time to file a counter affidavit. The case has been adjourned to November 7 for further hearing.

  • Divya Chandrababu
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Divya Chandrababu

    Divya Chandrababu is an award-winning political and human rights journalist based in Chennai, India. Divya is presently Assistant Editor of the Hindustan Times where she covers Tamil Nadu & Puducherry. She started her career as a broadcast journalist at NDTV-Hindu where she anchored and wrote prime time news bulletins. Later, she covered politics, development, mental health, child and disability rights for The Times of India. Divya has been a journalism fellow for several programs including the Asia Journalism Fellowship at Singapore and the KAS Media Asia- The Caravan for narrative journalism. Divya has a master's in politics and international studies from the University of Warwick, UK. As an independent journalist Divya has written for Indian and foreign publications on domestic and international affairs.Read More