Categorised as an unnatural offence, consensual sexual intercourse between persons of same-sex is termed ‘against the order of nature’ under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and can be punishable by life imprisonment.
The Constitution Bench of Supreme Court on Tuesday begun hearing petitions challenging section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises homosexuality. Categorised as an unnatural offence, consensual sexual intercourse between persons of same-sex is termed ‘against the order of nature’ under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and can be punishable by life imprisonment.
Here is a timeline of the long battle to strike down the British-era law.
THE BATTLE AGAINST SECTION 377
1994: Aids Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan files petition against Section 377. Petition lies dormant
1998: Women’s groups protest after right-wing organisations force cinemas to stop screening Fire, a film that depicted a lesbian relationship
2001: Naz Foundation files petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 377
2004: Delhi high court dismisses the case
2006: Supreme Court direct Delhi high court to hear the case; Voices Against 377, a coalition of human rights groups joins petition; Several LGBT persons file affidavits
2009: Delhi HC says Section 377 does not apply to consenting adults; Astrologer Suresh Kumar Koushal, and 15 others challenge this order in SC; Parents, academicians, and mental health professionals intervene in favour of LGBT persons
2013: Supreme Court strikes down Delhi high court judgment
2013: Global Day of Rage demonstrations organised in over 30 cities worldwide to protest against Section 377
2014: Curative petitions listed; SC delivers NALSA judgement recognising the rights of transgender persons
2016: Curative petitions referred to Constitution Bench; Two fresh petitions from LGBT persons, including Navtej Johar and Others vs Union of India challenging Section 377 filed
2018: Navtej Johar petition assigned to Constitution Bench; fresh petitions filed by NGOs, IIT students and alumni, and activists. Hearings begin in front of a five-judge bench.