Early whale wasn't gentle giant
A ferocious-looking fossil with sharp teeth found in Australia shows that ancestors of today's toothless blue whales were not all "gentle giants".india Updated: Aug 16, 2006 14:13 IST
A ferocious-looking fossil with sharp teeth found in Australia shows that ancestors of today's toothless blue whales were not all "gentle giants", a report said on Wednesday.
The 25 million-year-old fossil is of an early type of baleen whale, a group including modern humpback whales, minke whales and blue whales that feed via baleen, comb-like plates in their mouths that filter plankton from sea water.
"This bizarre, new baleen whale did not even have baleen," Erich Fitzgerald, of Monash University in Australia, said of the small whale that was probably up to 3.5 metres (11 ft 6 in) long.
"It had teeth and was a powerful predator that captured large fish, perhaps sharks, maybe even other whales," he told Reuters.
"Some of the early baleen whales weren't gentle giants."
Most scientists have believed that baleen whales quickly evolved baleen for feeding on tiny fish and plankton after breaking from a common ancestor with toothed whales almost 40 million years ago.
Modern toothed whales include dolphins, killer whales and sperm whales -- the species made famous as the bane of Captain Ahab in Herman Melville's "Moby Dick".
"This rewrites the picture of baleen whale evolution," Fitzgerald said. The fossil was found near Jan Juc, a town in Victoria, south-eastern Australia, and dubbed "Janjucetus".
Its sharp teeth were about 3 cms (1.2 inches) long and it also had large eyes, apparently suited for hunting, according to Fitzgerald's report, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Blue whales, which can exceed 150 tonnes and grow longer than 30 metres, are the largest creatures ever to inhabit the earth -- bigger than any dinosaur. Whales evolved from land mammals, where their closest relative is the hippopotamus.
First Published: Aug 16, 2006 14:13 IST