Supreme Court declines early hearing of petitions in Ayodhya land dispute case

ByAshok Bagriya
Nov 12, 2018 11:51 AM IST

The Supreme Court on Monday declined an early hearing in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute, sticking to its earlier decision to let the judges decide the course of hearings in the first week of January.

The Supreme Court on Monday declined an early hearing in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute, staying firm on its earlier decision to let judges decide the course of hearings in the first week of January.

A view of Supreme Court(PTI)
A view of Supreme Court(PTI)

Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha, one of the parties in the case scheduled to come up for hearing in January this year, had mentioned the request before a bench led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

We're now on WhatsApp. Click to join.

The top court promptly refused.

“We have already passed the order. The appeals are coming up in January. Permission declined,” Chief Justice Tarun Gogoi said.

In October, the Supreme Court had turned down a similar request from the Uttar Pradesh government and the lawyer who represents the deity Ram Lalla to take up the dispute after the Diwali break.

That decision was seen to have opened the possibility that the court may not deliver its verdict before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections expected to held around April-May.

The top court’s stand has triggered sharp reactions from some Hindu groups and senior BJP leaders who are nudging the government not to wait for the top court’s verdict but bring in an ordinance to settle the dispute in favour of a Ram temple.

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad, which had led the movement for the temple back in the nineties, had said the court’s decision had strengthened its view that people could not wait eternally for hearing of appeals.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – ideological mentor of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party – too had made known that it was “upset” with the delay.

“The faith of crores of Hindus is linked to the issue. If it is not on top of the Supreme Court’s priority list, it is an insult to the Hindu community,” said RSS general secretary Suresh Bhaiyyaji Joshi last week.

Union minister Uma Bharti, on the other hand, had warned that any talk of constructing a mosque within the periphery of Ayodhya can make Hindus “intolerant”. Her colleague Giriraj Singh has said no one can stop the construction of a Ram temple. Minister of state for law and justice PP Chaudhary suggested that legal option must be explored as the title suit has been pending in the court for years, and Bihar deputy chief minister Sushil Kumar Modi said construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya was the desire of “crores of Hindus”.

The court is hearing 14 petitions challenging a 2010 Allahabad high court decision that trifurcated the disputed site in Uttar Pradesh’s Ayodhya town between Hindus, Muslims and the representatives of Ram Lalla, a petitioner.

The Ayodhya dispute is among India’s most sensitive and divisive political issues. Hindus believe the 16th century mosque, Babri Masjid, was built over a temple dedicated to Hindu god Ram, whose birthplace is also considered to be at the site. The mosque was demolished by a mob of thousands in 1992, triggering a cycle of violence and riots across India.

"Exciting news! Hindustan Times is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
Get Latest India News along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world
Story Saved
Live Score
Saved Articles
My Reads
My Offers
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Friday, September 29, 2023
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Register Free and get Exciting Deals