Sign in

13 more districts declared backward

THE CENTRAL Government has declared 13 more districts as backward districts entitling each to Rs 20 cr Central grants from the Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) every year for the next five years to remove critical development gaps. Now the total number of backward districts in the State has gone up to 34, with 21 districts already ?enjoying? the backward status.

Published on: Sep 2, 2006, 01:49:00 IST
None | By , Lucknow
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

THE CENTRAL Government has declared 13 more districts as backward districts entitling each to Rs 20 cr Central grants from the Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) every year for the next five years to remove critical development gaps.

HT Image
HT Image

Now the total number of backward districts in the State has gone up to 34, with 21 districts already ‘enjoying’ the backward status.

Also, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) is being implemented only in the districts declared as backward by the Centre.

The Central Government has put more districts on the backward region list under an all-India exercise. Under this it has declared a total of 80 new districts, spreading over various States, as backward, increasing the tally of backward districts to 250.

Till now, there existed 170 backward districts across the Country.
The new districts declared backward in UP are: Ambedkar Nagar, Bahraich, Balrampur, Basti, Badaun, Etah Farukhabad, Gonda, Lakhmipur Khiri, Maharajganj, Sant Kabir Nagar, Siddhart Nagar and Sravasti.

They will now join the league of 21 already existing backward districts — Azamgarh, Banda, Barabanki, Chandauli, Chtrakoot, Fatehpur, Gorakhpur, Hamirpur, Hardoi, Jalaun, Jaunpur, Kaushambi, Kushi Nagar, Lalitpur, Mahoba, Mirzapur, Pratapgarh, Rae Bareli Sitapur, Sonbhadra, and Unnao.

The Central Government had started identifying backward districts in UP in 2003-05. In the first phase it declared only five districts as backward.

The grants to be given to the 34 backward districts will be used to remove regional disparities and inequalities among various income groups by providing infrastructure and promoting agrarian reforms.

Confirming that 13 more districts had been categorised as backward, Secretary, Planning Commission, Chandrapal told Hindustan Times from Delhi on phone that development projects like hospitals, ITIs and schools would be set up in the backward districts. “But the focus would be on benefiting the SC-ST population as much as possible,” he said.

The Central Government had in February this year announced the creation of BRGF with an allocation of Rs 5,000 cr. With the establishment of this fund, the Centre’s Rashtriya Sam Vikas Yojana (RSVY) being implemented in the backward districts will be wound up. Money from the BRGF will go to the State’s Consolidated Fund from where it will be directed to the Panchayat level.

Additional rural development commissioner Chandrapal Arun said that it was Centre’s prerogative to declare a State as backward.

He said that there were certain indicators that were taken into count while deciding to put a State on the backward region list. Among the main indicators were high BPL population and the SC-ST population, low agriculture productivity, and lack of infrastructure, he added.

  • Brajendra K Parashar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Brajendra K Parashar

    Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.Read More