...
...
Next Story

Centre asks Meta to review content recommendation system over law and order posts to avoid ‘public confusion, disorder’

The advisory also asks the company to report measures taken, prompting concerns from digital-rights advocates about censorship and free speech.

Updated on: Oct 18, 2026, 07:14:18 IST
Advertisement

The ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) has asked Meta to ensure that its recommendation systems do not result in showing only a single or limited set of narratives, but instead provide diverse information. This comes two days after the ministry sent an advisory to all social media companies asking them to give priority to government complaints about content that could affect public order.

The ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) has asked Meta to ensure that its recommendation systems do not result in showing only a single or limited set of narratives. (REUTERS)
The ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) has asked Meta to ensure that its recommendation systems do not result in showing only a single or limited set of narratives. (REUTERS)

The advisory, dated October 10, was sent only to Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook. It asked the company to move faster on spotting and escalating posts that are being amplified through its recommendations, leading to causing confusion, violence or public disorder. Unlike the October 8 advisory, which did not require companies to report back, this one asks Meta to act “with immediate effect” and “apprise the ministry of the measures undertaken”.

The Meta advisory, seen by HT, said, “It has come to the notice of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) that certain content relating to ongoing public events and developments is being prominently displayed and recommended to users through the feeds/recommendation systems of platforms operated by Meta. Such content includes videos, images, statements and static graphics relating to public-order and law-and-order situations, which, when presented without adequate context or disproportionately amplified through recommendation mechanisms, may contribute to public confusion, apprehension and disturbance of public order and social tranquillity.”

To be sure, the October 10 advisory, like the October 8 one, does not name any protest or event. MeitY did not respond to HT’s request for a comment.

Also Read | Meta believes Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full models have touched the frontier

What Meta has been asked to do

Beyond reminding the company of its due diligence obligations under Information Technology (IT) Act and Rules, the advisory lists six steps for Meta. First, the company has been asked to take “appropriate measures to identify and address”, in accordance with applicable law, content that falls within the categories prescribed under the IT Rules, including content that could cause public disorder or incite violence or other unlawful activity.

Second, Meta has been asked to review its recommendation and content-ranking mechanisms so that potentially misleading, manipulated or out-of-context content is not “disproportionately amplified or repeatedly recommended” to users. Third, the company should provide adequate context on photographs, videos, graphics and other content showing ongoing public events, especially where the authenticity, date, location or circumstances of the content may not be readily apparent to users.

Fourth, it should make sure recommendation systems do not expose users disproportionately to a single or limited set of narratives and “endeavour to provide appropriate diversity of relevant and credible information”. The advisory does not say how this diversity is to be measured or who will decide what counts as credible.

Also Read | Meta acted on 5.3 mn pieces of child abuse content in H1'26; rolls out new AI tools to check ads

Fifth, Meta has been asked to strengthen its mechanisms for rapid identification, review and escalation of content that is gaining significant reach through recommendation systems and could cause widespread public confusion, apprehension, violence or disturbance of public order. Sixth, it should cooperate in a timely manner with law-enforcement and other authorised government agencies, including by furnishing information or assistance in line with applicable law and within the timelines set by the IT Rules, 2021.

Apar Gupta, founder of digital rights advocacy Internet Freedom Foundation, said, “This advisory even though is not legally binding is a continuing censorship directive since the first Jantar Mantar protests in July after which Meta, specifically Instagram have been placed under government pressure. This is to ensure rather than a legal basis for takedowns a pro-active censorship mechanisms deployed by META so protests related accounts and posts are restricted without any government orders. Over the past two weeks IFF has serviced atleast 9-10 creators and journalists for account based restrictions that are being pro-actively done by META. Even this advisory which contains phrases like content “without adequate context” and periods of “heightened public-order sensitivity” are not tied to any provision of the IT Act or the IT rules. “This is primarily a negotiation place between a government ministry and the world’s largest social media company to settle the limits of free speech through a private correspondence. MeitY must withdraw this advisory forthwith, and Meta must publicly disclose every takedown and every act of downranking carried out under it.”

Also Read | Meta To Report Child Sexual Abuse Material Directly To Indian Agencies| Instagram,Facebook

Content MeitY wants Meta to watch

The government asked Meta to exercise “enhanced diligence”, like it asked other social media intermediaries in October 8 advisory, on content surfaced, recommended or amplified through its feed and recommendation systems, “particularly during periods of heightened public-order sensitivity”. It listed five kinds of content that need particular attention: Old, unrelated or selectively edited visuals presented as current events; unverified or misleading claims about the imposition of emergency, restrictions, police action or other official measures; audio-visual material on law-and-order situations without adequate context; content likely to incite violence or other unlawful activity; content that is being disproportionately amplified through recommendation mechanisms despite being potentially misleading or lacking adequate context.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did MeitY ask Meta to do about its recommendation systems?

MeitY asked Meta to ensure its systems do not expose users disproportionately to a single or limited set of narratives and to endeavour to provide diverse, relevant and credible information.

What kinds of content did MeitY ask Meta to pay particular attention to?

The advisory listed old, unrelated or selectively edited visuals presented as current events; unverified or misleading claims about official measures; law-and-order material without adequate context; content likely to incite violence or unlawful activity; and potentially misleading or inadequately contextualised content that is disproportionately amplified.

Did the October 10 advisory name a protest or event?

No. The story says the October 10 advisory, like the October 8 one, does not name any protest or event.
Powered ByAsk HT
 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sejal Sharma

I am a technology policy reporter with the National Political Bureau at Hindustan Times, based in New Delhi. I cover digital policy and the intersection of technology and society, focusing mainly on what's happening in India. My beat often involves tracking platform regulation, privacy, internet curbs, and the real-world impact of digital rules, among other things. Can usually be found reading government notifications so that you don't have to. I cover three key ministries: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Ministry of Communications, and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B). I am originally from New Delhi and a graduate of the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. Over the past nine years, I have worked across television, digital and print media with The Secretariat, CNN-News18, Tiranga TV, Interesting Engineering, and now Hindustan Times. Although I am not on X, I can be reached at sejal.sharma@hindustantimes.com for tips, a chat or book recommendations. I respond fast, usually within a couple of hours. Outside of work, I enjoy playing badminton and driving my car. I am a firm believer that every trip — work or leisure — deserves a fridge magnet.

Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks