...
...
Next Story

IUML challenges new citizenship law in Supreme Court, say it’s unconstitutional

The petition by IUML - its four lawmakers also are petitioners - argued that the new changes cleared by Parliament discriminate on the basis of religion.

Updated on: Aug 4, 2020, 01:22:45 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), a Kerala party that has four lawmakers in Parliament, on Thursday challenged the contentious changes to the Citizenship Bill in the Supreme Court, arguing that the law was unconstitutional and should be struck down. The petitioners have also filed a separate request urging the top court to stay the legislation that cleared its Rajya Sabha test last evening.

Once the law cleared by Parliament gets presidential assent and comes into effect, all non-Muslims who migrated to India from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh before 31 December 2014 would be entitled to get Indian citizenship (Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Once the law cleared by Parliament gets presidential assent and comes into effect, all non-Muslims who migrated to India from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh before 31 December 2014 would be entitled to get Indian citizenship (Amal KS/HT PHOTO)

Once the law cleared by Parliament gets presidential assent and comes into effect, all non-Muslims who migrated to India from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh before 31 December 2014 would be entitled to get Indian citizenship on the grounds that they faced persecution back home.

Watch | IUML to move SC against Citizenship Amendment Bill, BJP & Cong trade barbs

Many opposition parties led by the Congress had voted against the legislation in Parliament, arguing that it violated constitutional guarantees of equality. Home Minister Amit Shah had, however, argued that the constitution provided for reasonable classification to fast-track citizenship requests from these refugees.

The petition by IUML - its four lawmakers also are petitioners - argued that the new changes cleared by Parliament discriminate on the basis of religion.

“The amendment seeks to segregate persons on the basis of their religion and grant them the benefit of naturalization, if they belong to a certain religion, in this case Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians,who are from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh,” the petition said.

“This religious segregation without any reasonable differentiation, not only violates Article 14, but is also blatantly opposed to the very basic structure of the Constitution and to the very idea of India as a country which treats people of all faiths equally,” it said.

 
Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe