...
...
Next Story

Police encounter not the solution: NHRC chairman

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman and former chief justice of India justice KG Balakrishnan has said police encounters with criminals are not the solution to the problem (of lawlessness).

Updated on: Nov 26, 2013, 09:10:53 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Lucknow
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) chairman and former chief justice of India justice KG Balakrishnan has said police encounters with criminals are not the solution to the problem (of lawlessness).

HT Image
HT Image

The NHRC chairman, who arrived in Varanasi on Monday for a two-day public hearing by the commission starting on Tuesday, referred to the efficacy of the guidelines issued by the NHRC on May 12, 2010 with regard to police encounters.

He told HT: “After the guidelines were issued by the NHRC, police encounters have gone down drastically all across the country, especially in UP.”

Elaborating on the issue, the former CJI said: “Encounters of criminals is not the remedy. There are laws. Police must arrest criminals and, thereafter, the law will take its own course.”

On the Aarushi-Hemraj murder case, the NHRC chairman stated that it was just like any other murder case.

“More than 65,000 murders take place in the country every year. The Aarushi murder case is just one of them,” the former CJI said. He advocated more powers for the commission.

The chairman of the NHRC stated that the commission would take up 123 cases of human rights violations during its two-day hearing in Varanasi.

Two other commission members justice D Murugesan and Sharad Chandra Sinha, an IPS officer and former director general of the national investigation agency (NIA), have also arrived along with the NHRC chairman.

MAXIMUM COMPLAINTS FROM UP

After the NHRC was constituted in 1993, it has received around 14 lakh complaints of human rights violations till date and half of these have been from Uttar Pradesh.

Nearly 20,000 cases are pending with the commission for disposal.

“The maximum number of cases of human rights violations come from UP. This is because UP is a big state, both in terms of area and population,” Anil Kumar Parashar, joint registrar of the commission, said.

People in UP were also more aware and, therefore, the commission got more complaints from the state, Parashar added.

On the nature of complaints which the commission would take up in its two-day hearing in Varanasi, Parashar stated that complaints ranging from bonded labour, ration cards, voter card, appointment related cases, police atrocities and complaints of members of schedule castes are with the commission.

The commission has already held public hearings in Odisha, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan and Maharashtra. Uttar Pradesh is the sixth state where the commission has organised a public hearing.

In UP, the first public hearing was scheduled in Meerut on November 11 and 12. But the commission decided to take up the cases of Meerut zone at its office in New Delhi as the number of complaints from Meerut zone were less.

As for Varanasi, the commission had decided to take up cases in the city itself as it had received 123 complaints.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Pawan Dixit

Pawan Dixit, Assistant Editor, brings over 20 years of frontline reporting experience to the newsroom. A specialist on Uttar Pradesh politics and governance, he has reported from the ground across the state’s most consequential stories. He cut his teeth in eastern UP, spending 15 years covering the region. Based in Varanasi, he reported the 2012 UP Assembly polls and the 2014 Lok Sabha elections that reshaped the state’s political map. Moving to Lucknow in 2016, he has since led coverage of the 2017 and 2022 UP Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. His reporting tracks the BJP’s strategy, opposition moves, and voter sentiment across all 75 districts. Pawan has been a constant presence in Ayodhya since 2016. He reported the entire arc of the Ram Mandir movement — from the legal fight to the Supreme Court verdict, through temple construction, to the inauguration. He continues to track every development at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. On the state beat, he covers the BJP, the Industrial Development Department, and handles key outstation political assignments. He also reports major cases from the district court, Lucknow bench of the High Court, and the State Information Commission. Along with this, he also reports on NGT's important decisions related to UP. Known for sharp sourcing and clear analysis, Pawan connects politics, policy, infrastructure and faith — the forces driving UP today. He has reported developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir movement since 2016. The Supreme Court's Ram Mandir verdict, temple construction and the its opening have been reported by him. He reports all developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir Trust. He covers state BJP, Industrial development department, outstation political assignments, reports special cases from district court, high court and state information commission

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks