Lindsay Clancy trial: Dr. Phillip Resnick makes chilling revelations - 5 things to know as ‘she was a puppet’

Lindsay Clancy trial: Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist, testified via video in a murder trial, despite technical issues.

Forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick was the first witness to testify on Friday. He took part in the murder trial via a video feed that experienced some glitches.

Dr. Phillip Resnick, a forensic psychiatrist, testified in a murder trial through a video link. He has a history of working on cases involving infamous criminals. (AP)

Resnick collaborated with prosecutors on the cases involving serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, James Holmes, who was responsible for the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting, and Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, as he informed the jury.

Additionally, he provided testimony in the defense of Andrea Yates during both of her trials in the early 2000s, where she faced accusations of drowning her five children.

Dr. Phillip Resnick testifies: 5 things to know

1. Dr. Resnick informed the jury that Clancy exhibited signs of being “clearly psychotic” on the day she killed her three children. “She was clearly psychotic on that day,” Resnick said.
2. He explained that on January 24, 2023, Clancy perceived a "command voice" instructing her to commit the horrific actions. “She had what is known as a ‘delusion of influence,’” the expert continued.
3. “Not only did she hear a command but she felt her body was taken over by an external force where she was in a dream state and did not have control of her own body. It was almost like she was a puppet and someone else was pulling the strings.”
4. Dr. Resnick stated that Clancy had a twisted yet selfless motive for the murder of her children. He explained that she held a misguided belief that if she took her own life, her children would suffer so greatly in her absence that it would be justifiable to end their lives as well. “In her mind, she believed she would be doing her children a favor by having them go to heaven with her rather than remain on Earth without her doing the mothering. Her mind was distorted like that.”
5. Clancy “believed her children would be miserable. And she couldn’t imagine them continuing to exist and have a decent life without her being there as a mother,” he stated. “So in that sense she did what she believed was morally right, even though she understood that ordinarily killing a child is against the law, she believed that she was doing what was right for her children with her distorted psychotic symptoms about her children’s need for her.”