...
...
Next Story

SC extends bar on trial court from taking note of chargesheet against Ashoka University professor

SC extends bar on trial court from taking note of chargesheet against Ashoka University professor

Published on: Jan 06, 2026 01:33 PM IST
Advertisement

New Delhi, The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended its order restraining the trial court from taking cognisance of the chargesheet filed by Haryana SIT in the FIR against Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad, who was booked for social media posts on Operation Sindoor.

SC extends bar on trial court from taking note of chargesheet against Ashoka University professor
SC extends bar on trial court from taking note of chargesheet against Ashoka University professor

A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi passed the order after Additional Solicitor General SV Raju informed it that though chargesheet was filed in August 2025, no sanction has been given by the Haryana government so far.

The ASG sought more time to have clear instructions as to whether the state government is inclined not to grant sanction as a one time magnanimity and close the issue.

The top court allowed Raju to seek instructions and posted the matter after six weeks.

The apex court orally remarked that its expects that Mahmudabad will behave responsibly during this period.

"We also don't want that as soon as they decides not to grant sanction, you go and write any damn thing you want. If they show magnanimity then you also have to be responsible," it observed.

On July 16, the top court questioned Haryana SIT's line of investigation in the case, saying "it misdirected itself".

It asked the Haryana SIT headed by a senior police officer to only confine itself to the two FIRs against Mahmudabad over his contentious social media posts and see if there was an offence and submit its report in four weeks.

The top court had relaxed the professor's bail condition imposed on May 21 and allowed him write posts, articles and express any opinion except on the sub judice case.

On May 28, the top court said there was no impediment on the professor's right to speech and expression, but barred him from sharing anything online on the cases against him.

The top court had made it clear that the subject matter of investigation was two FIRs lodged against the professor and asked the Haryana police not to go "left and right" in the investigation and seek the "devices", which the cops said they would like to examine.

On May 21, the top court granted him interim bail, but refused to stay the investigation against him.

The top court had also restrained the professor from expressing any opinion in relation to the terrorist attack on Indian soil or the counter-response given by the Indian armed forces.

It had directed a three-member SIT to look into the FIRs against him.

Haryana Police arrested Mahmudabad on May 18 after two FIRs were registered against him.

His contentious social media posts on Operation Sindoor, it is alleged, endangered the sovereignty and integrity of the country.

The two FIRs one based on a complaint by the chairperson of Haryana State Commission for Women, Renu Bhatia, and the other on a complaint by a village sarpanch were lodged by Rai police in Sonipat district.

He was booked under BNS sections 152 , 353 , 79 and 196 .

Several political parties and academicians condemned the arrest.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

 
Get latest updates on NIRF Ranking along with Education and updates on other Board Exams and Competitive Exams at Hindustan Times. Also get latest Job updates on Employment News.
Get latest updates on NIRF Ranking along with Education and updates on other Board Exams and Competitive Exams at Hindustan Times. Also get latest Job updates on Employment News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe