The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a Madras High Court judgment striking down a Tamil Nadu government order that allowed individuals from backward classes and denotified communities who convert to Islam to claim reservation benefits
Rejecting an appeal by the Tamil Nadu government, a bench of justices PK Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar held that a person’s pre-conversion social status does not automatically entitle them to affirmative action benefits after converting to a non-Hindu faith.
“A person who converts to Islam does not become part of the Muslim backward class category. A person’s pre-conversion status cannot confer on him the status of backwardness,” the bench said.
The Tamil Nadu government had approached the top court against the high court’s verdict that scrapped a 2024 government order which allowed converts from backwards classes, most backward classes, denotified communities and scheduled caste to be issued community certificates of one of the seven notified backwards class Muslim sects.
The state government had reasoned that the move was based on the recommendation of the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission.
The bench rejected the argument. “A person who is converting from a Hindu social order to non-Hindu social order cannot claim affirmative action under Article 16(4) of the Constitution merely on the basis of social backwardness associated with his pre-conversion status,” it said.
{{/usCountry}}The bench rejected the argument. “A person who is converting from a Hindu social order to non-Hindu social order cannot claim affirmative action under Article 16(4) of the Constitution merely on the basis of social backwardness associated with his pre-conversion status,” it said.
{{/usCountry}}The court was of the view that conversion severs the legal foundation of caste-based backwardness associated with the Hindu social order under Article 16(4) of the Constitution.
The legal challenge originated from a petition filed by Paramasivam, a Hindu who converted to Islam in 2015 and adopted the name Sameer Ahmed. After local district authorities rejected his application for a Backward Class Muslim (BCM) certificate as a “Labbai” Muslim, he approached the high court.
He argued that the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission recommended in his favour and directed that Hindu backward classes who convert to Islam shall be treated as Backward Class Muslims and issued community certificates.
The high court held that membership of a notified Muslim community, such as Labbai, Rowther, Marakkayar or Deccani Muslim, was determined solely by birth and could not be acquired by conversion. The court held that these communities represent distinct socio-cultural communities rather than theological sects, making entry via religious conversion legally untenable.