ICSSR issues show-cause to CSDS over past irregularities
ICSSR issued a show-cause notice to CSDS for irregularities and biased data on elections, threatening to withdraw funding if not resolved in 7 days.
New Delhi: The Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), an autonomous body under the Union ministry of education, on Wednesday issued a show-cause notice to the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), citing past irregularities and “gross violations” of grant-in-aid rules.

The notice accuses CSDS of releasing misleading election data related to Maharashtra and giving a “biased interpretation” of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, allegedly aimed at “maligning the reputation and image” of the Election Commission of India (ECI).
The national body that oversees research in the social sciences in the country, has threatened to cancel and withdraw the grant in aid to CSDS, which it said “is discretionary in nature,” if the think tank fails to submit its explanation on “administrative and financial irregularities” and on “deliberate misrepresentation of facts” within 7 days.
This comes a day after Sanjay Kumar, a professor at CSDS Delhi had on Tuesday apologised for his X post on the Maharashtra elections, which wrongly reported a considerable fall in voter numbers in the two assembly seats compared to the Lok Sabha elections. He said the error occurred due to misreading of a row by the data team. “The tweet has since been removed. I had no intention of dispersing any form of misinformation,” wrote Sanjay Kumar, who is among the most senior researchers at the independent think tank which is known for its analysis of elections. Meanwhile, a case has been registered against Kumar by the district electoral officers (DEO) of Nashik and Nagpur in Maharashtra for allegedly misleading voters with wrong data on the Devlali and Ramtek assembly segments for the Lok Sabha and state elections held in 2024.
In its show-cause notice to CSDS director Awadhendra Sharan, seen by HT, the ICSSR said that in a study on Maharashtra polls, CSDS deliberately allowed its employee to “make incorrect statements in media maligning the reputation and image” of ECI and subsequently retracted from the same “citing glitches in data analysis regarding elections in Maharashtra.”
A CSDS study titled “How inclusive is EC’s special revision exercise?” presented a “biased interpretation” of the ECI’s SIR drive in Bihar and published media stories for “deliberately scandalizing and maligning the reputation and image” of the constitutional body, ICSSR said.
“And whereas it has also come to notice of ICSSR that CSDS and its employees have deliberately been indulging in data manipulation with a deliberate and malicious action to create a narrative with the intention of undermining the sanctity of the constitution authority such as ECI,” ICSSR said asking the CSDS to reveal its funding source for both the studies.
ICSSR in its notice said that CSDS has “continuously been involved in various irregularities in the past” and was asked to submit response and action taken on those irregularities but, “no satisfactory response and action taken report has been received from CSDS.”
ICSSR listed several past irregularities at CSDS, including appointments of faculty and non-academic staff in violation of University Grants Commission (UGC) and ICSSR guidelines, unauthorized financial benefits, non-conduct of governing body elections, opaque selection of the Director, irregular pension and House Rent Allowance (HRA) payments causing loss of public funds, failure to get annual accounts audited by Comptroller Auditor General (CAG), non-disclosure of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) funds, and non-compliance with ICSSR’s Good Governance principles.
Under its “grant in aid rules to societies and institutions doing research in the field of social sciences (which are outside the scope of University Grants Commission),” ICSSR provides assistance to various societies and institutions doing research in the field of social science.
On August 7, 2023, in response to a question in Parliament, the ministry of education informed Lok Sabha that CSDS was allocated ₹13.92 crore over three years (between 2020–21 and the first quarter of 2023–24).
“We have asked CSDS to give an explanation on irregularities and misinterpretation of data within seven days of today’s notice in respect. ICSSR will take appropriate action against CSDS as per the provisions of its grant-in-aid rules,” said a senior ICSSR official.
ABOUT THE AUTHORSanjay MauryaSanjay Maurya is a Principal Correspondent with Hindustan Times, where he covers education, with a focus on school and higher education, competitive examinations, education policy and governance. Working as part of the National Bureau, he is based in New Delhi and reports on the Ministry of Education and covers various statutory bodies like UGC, AICTE and NCTE and autonomous bodies like CBSE and NCERT. His reporting also tracks the implementation of key government reforms and policies from school education to higher education including in IITs, NITs, IIMs, central and state universities, and their impact on students and educational institutions. His reporting on the irregularities and rushed implementation of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for evaluation of Class 12 board exams 2026, triggered administrative action, leading to the transfer of the board's two senior-most officials and the constitution of a committee to probe alleged irregularities in procurement process of the system. He joined Hindustan Times in December 2024. Prior to that, he had a three-year stint at Careers360, where he reported on school and higher education, entrance examinations, admissions, rankings and various education policies involving universities and professional education bodies. Over the years, Maurya has reported extensively on major developments in India's education sector, including the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, changes in school education, higher education regulation, and the evolution of entrance examinations such as NEET, JEE and CUET. He regularly produces data-driven and explanatory stories based on government documents, parliamentary proceedings, court records and official data. His focus remains on helping readers understand how education policies and institutional decisions affect millions of students, teachers and educational institutions across the country.Read More

E-Paper


