A decade-old official letter of a bureaucrat, who is now holding a sensitive post in the Haryana chief minister’s office (CMO), about land acquisition in Gurgaon’s Manesar has put the Manohar Lal Khattar-led BJP government in a tight spot.
The 1997-batch Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer Rakesh Gupta, who is currently the additional principal secretary (to CM), when posted as Gurgaon deputy commissioner (DC) in 2007 had moved the contentious letter seeking “early action”, as demanded by Manesar residents, to release their 400-odd acquired houses from the land acquisition exercise. But within the CMO and Haryana Advocate General (AG) office, the carefully-worded letter is being interpreted as an attempt by the then Congress government to build a larger case for dropping notified land from acquisition which the builders had bought from the farmers when the land acquisition exercise was underway.
The letter surfaced during the recent Supreme Court hearing in the suspect land deals in Manesar that the CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) are investigating. Khattar government has been turning heat on former chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda on the issue of land deals across the state. “As the officer holds a very sensitive position in the CMO, we had conveyed to the government about what transpired during the hearing in the Supreme Court, besides some oral observations of the court about this letter,” a source in the AG office told HT.
When contacted, Haryana AG BR Mahajan refused to comment. Sources say a counsel opposing the government placed before the Apex Court bench of justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and UU Lalit the letter to support the argument on how even the district administration was of the view that people were suffering due to acquisition and their request to release the acquired land should addressed in the earliest.
The catch, top government sources say, in the May 16, 2007 letter of Gupta as DC Gurgaon to then principal secretary (industries) PK Chaudhary, was that it was written after the notification under section 6 was published.
“The acquisition proceedings cannot be dropped after notification under section 6 is notified,” a government functionary said.
In his letter (No 1322-23/DRA) copied to managing director, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and Director, industrial department, Gupta had stated the residents of Manesar village blocked national highway No. 8 for almost two hours on May 13, 2007 causing inconvenience to public. “The villagers told the administration that Hooda had announced in their village that cemented houses will be released from acquisition, which is yet to be implemented…I will urge you for an early action in this matter so the problem is resolved,” reads the letter written in Hindi. Incidentally, in his February 2, 2016 statement of immovable property return, IAS officer Rakesh Gupta has mentioned four properties, including “1084.42 square ft shop area (ABW Towers) Gurgaon” that he and his wife own and “purchased in 2007-08 for Rs 30 lakh.”
{{/usCountry}}In his letter (No 1322-23/DRA) copied to managing director, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation and Director, industrial department, Gupta had stated the residents of Manesar village blocked national highway No. 8 for almost two hours on May 13, 2007 causing inconvenience to public. “The villagers told the administration that Hooda had announced in their village that cemented houses will be released from acquisition, which is yet to be implemented…I will urge you for an early action in this matter so the problem is resolved,” reads the letter written in Hindi. Incidentally, in his February 2, 2016 statement of immovable property return, IAS officer Rakesh Gupta has mentioned four properties, including “1084.42 square ft shop area (ABW Towers) Gurgaon” that he and his wife own and “purchased in 2007-08 for Rs 30 lakh.”
{{/usCountry}}