Sign in

Delayed possession: Can a developer blame the landowner’s jail term for failing to secure an occupancy certificate?

In a contentious case near Mumbai, a developer's claims of delays due to a jailed landowner were dismissed by MahaRERA, which ruled in favor of the homebuyer and mandated compensation for the prolonged wait for possession and the Occupation Certificate.

Published on: Feb 11, 2026 8:56 AM IST
By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

In a dramatic turn in a long-stalled project near Mumbai, a real estate developer attributed the delay in obtaining the Occupation Certificate (OC) to multiple factors, including legal disputes and the landowner's imprisonment in an unrelated case. However, the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) dismissed these claims, ruled in favour of the homebuyer, and directed the developer to pay interest for the delayed possession.

A real estate developer has attributed the delay in obtaining the Occupation Certificate (OC) to multiple factors, including legal disputes and the landowner's imprisonment in an unrelated case. (Photo for representational purposes only) (Unsplash)
A real estate developer has attributed the delay in obtaining the Occupation Certificate (OC) to multiple factors, including legal disputes and the landowner's imprisonment in an unrelated case. (Photo for representational purposes only) (Unsplash)

The case

The case concerned a long-delayed housing project, where the homebuyer approached MahaRERA seeking relief for the extended wait for possession. In his defence, the developer claimed that the delay in obtaining the OC was due to legal issues and the landowner being jailed in an unrelated case, which he said caused technical delays beyond his control.

According to the order, the homebuyer had purchased the flat under an agreement for sale executed in 2010, for a total consideration of around 20 lakh. While the agreement did not specify a possession date, the homebuyer claimed that the developer’s representatives had promised possession within one year. The project later ran into legal trouble, prompting the developer to offer a refund, but the homebuyer chose to remain invested.

Homebuyer’s plea

Due to the delay in handing over possession of the flat along with the OC, the homebuyer approached MahaRERA in 2020. The complaint stated that the developer, while registering the project with MahaRERA, had unilaterally and unreasonably extended the possession date from the initially committed 2011 to 2017, and later to 2019. Despite these extensions, possession of the flat along with the OC was still not provided.

The homebuyer sought directions for the developer to pay interest for each month of delay, starting from 2013, three years after the flat was booked, or, alternatively, to pay interest at the highest marginal cost of lending rate (MCLR) of the State Bank of India (SBI) plus 2% per month, calculated from the proposed completion date of the project as per MahaRERA, i.e., from 2017, until full realisation.

Also Read: Delayed possession: After 17 years of waiting, Mumbai homebuyers finally see hope as MHADA lifts stop-work notice

Developer’s defence

In response to the homebuyers’ allegations before MahaRERA, the developer stated that the agreement did not specify a possession date and was executed under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 (MOFA).

The developer said the homebuyer had agreed to all terms and consciously entered into the agreement without objection, noting that no commitment was made to hand over possession within a stipulated time frame.

The developer said that court cases delayed the project, but claimed efforts were made to protect buyers’ interests. Homebuyers were repeatedly offered two options: a flat in another project or a full refund with interest. The complainant chose to wait, which, according to the developer, waived any compensation claims for the alleged delay.

Also Read: Maharashtra ends requirement for slum-dwellers’ consent in cluster redevelopment projects; All you need to know

The developer further stated that construction delays were due to an injunction order issued by the Civil Court and were therefore not attributable to them.

Regarding the Occupation Certificate (OC), the developer said the application was submitted in December 2018, but authorities required the landowner’s signature. The landowner was jailed and facing insolvency proceedings, preventing the signing of documents. Although the developer sought a waiver of this requirement, the OC remained pending.

Also Read: Mumbai real estate: Studios, 1 BHKs and 2 BHKs made up nearly 60% of 2025 launches, as per MahaRERA data

MahaRERA's verdict

MahaRERA, in its order, directed the developer to hand over possession of the flat along with the OC and to pay interest for the delay in the project.

The MahaRERA in its order stated, "The developer is directed to handover possession of the said flat to the homebuyer along with OC, within 30 days from the date of this order with interest paid towards the sale consideration at the rate of State Bank of India’s Highest Marginal Cost of Lending Rate plus 2 percent per annum from 2013 till actual possession of the said flat is handed over to the homebuyer by the developer."

  • Mehul R Thakkar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Mehul R Thakkar

    Mehul R Thakkar is a Mumbai-based journalist who closely tracks the city’s ever-evolving real estate landscape. He believes that Mumbai presents a unique reality that, while Mumbaikars deeply aspire to own a home in the city of dreams, many spend little actual time living in it due to long commutes and demanding work lives. With over 11 years of experience in journalism, I have reported across a wide spectrum of beats, including real estate, housing, infrastructure, aviation, and education. I have also extensively covered the workings of India’s wealthiest civic body, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), providing insight into the policy, governance, and urban planning decisions that directly influence Mumbai’s growth. Before joining Hindustan Times, I worked in fast-paced digital and print newsrooms, including Moneycontrol.com and Deccan Chronicle, as well as national dailies such as The Asian Age and DNA. Outside the newsroom, I am an avid weather tracker, a fan of spy thrillers in both books and films, and a keen follower of international affairs.Read More

Stay updated with latest Real Estate news and updates from India and around the World, explore the latest market moves and premium property listings updates now on Hindustan Times