Today in New Delhi, India
Jun 14, 2019-Friday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

The Union budget must incentivise long-term household savings

The main challenge is not the unavailability of savings but the composition of savings and the intermediation to channel savings into investment. There is a deep link between tax incentives and household savings in pension and insurance.

analysis Updated: Jun 14, 2019 08:40 IST
Ila Patnaik
Ila Patnaik
Union budget,tax incentive,savings rate
Man counting college savings fund, tuition fee or student loan with calculator. Education price and expenses concept. Money and papers on table. Calculating budget and planning finance.(Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Gross savings constitute savings of households, private corporate sector and public sector. Savings by the household sectors is the most prominent component of savings. The large financing needs of investment in infrastructure require that long-term financial savings of households to increase and to be channelled for this need. This requires reform and development of the financial sector that can play the role of this intermediation. The first is the reform on the savings side. Savings of Indian households are primarily in short-term assets. The challenge is to incentivise these into long-term savings such as insurance and pensions. The Union budget and tax incentives play a critical role in encouraging households to save in these instruments. The coming budget needs to give priority to this need.

In a recent paper on Savings and Investment in India co-authored by me along with Radhika Pandey, we analyse trends in savings and investment in India and the challenges faced in channelling domestic savings into the infrastructure sector where the needs for long term funds runs into thousands of crores of rupees. We argue that these needs can be met only if infrastructure investment moves away from the banking system and households save more in insurance and pension assets and a deep and well functioning market intermediates these funds effectively.

A high domestic savings rate has been an important part of India’s growth story. High investment and an economic boom during the 2003-2008 period was supported by a strong savings rate. The savings rate surged from 25.9% in 2003 to 36.8% in 2008. The rise in the aggregate savings rate during the high growth phase from 2003-2008 was driven by savings in the household sector. However since 2012, we have seen a decline in the aggregate savings rate as well as in household savings rate. The aggregate savings rate declined from 34% in 2012 to 30.5% in 2017-18. The household savings rate declined from 22.4% in 2012 to 17.2% in 2017.

Household savings as a per cent to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) show a steep decline in recent years. What could be the possible explanation for the decline in household savings? The term ‘households’ includes not only individual households but also non-corporate businesses. The unregistered micro, small and medium enterprises are thus covered under the definition of household sector. It is this sector that suffered due to the twin shocks of demonetisation and Goods and Services Tax which might be part of the explanation for the decline.

Bank deposits constitute the bulk of household financial savings, though its share in the overall household financial savings has seen a dip from 2011-2012 onwards. Still 57% of the financial savings are in cash and deposits leave a very small portion of savings in long-term savings. Shares and debentures constitute a small part of the overall financial savings of households. Investments in provident and pension funds have seen a gradual rise, though they still constitute a small proportion of the overall saving.

Insurance and pension penetration are low by international standards. Pension funds’ assets are defined as assets bought with the contributions to a pension plan for the exclusive purpose of financing pension plan benefits. The pension fund is a pool of assets forming an independent legal entity. India lags behind not only advanced economies but is also placed after emerging economies in pension funds penetration.

India significantly trails other countries in insurance penetration. The life and non-life insurance premium income formed 2.72% and 0.77% of GDP respectively in 2016. This is low compared to the global average of 3.47% and 2.81% of life and non-life insurance premium respectively. We attempt to estimate the time it would take for India to reach the current level of global average insurance penetration. Assuming the present average growth of insurance penetration in India, it would take us approximately 21 years to catch up with the global average.

The main challenge is not the unavailability of savings but the composition of savings and the intermediation to channel savings into investment. In previous research, the authors have found that there is a deep link between tax incentives and household savings in pension and insurance. The forthcoming budget needs to keep this in mind.

Ila Patnaik is an economist and a professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy

The views expressed are personal

By special arrangement with

First Published: Jun 14, 2019 08:40 IST