...
...
Next Story

Consumers in UP may enjoy ‘no power tariff hike’ for more years

This year marked the sixth consecutive zero-hike tariff order, with the UPERC again concluding that the discoms were sitting on a substantial revenue surplus, leaving no justification to raise tariffs

Published on: Nov 27, 2025, 03:14:19 IST
Advertisement

LUCKNOW Power consumers in UP are likely to continue enjoying ‘no tariff hike’ for more years, if the state electricity regulator continues to apply the surplus-based logic it has followed for the past six years. This year marked the sixth consecutive zero-hike tariff order, with the UP Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) again concluding that the discoms were sitting on a substantial revenue surplus, leaving no justification to raise tariffs.

This surplus phenomenon began after UPERC’s 2019 tariff regulations sharply tightened norms for allowable expenditure like power purchase, O&M, salaries and capital investment etc. (Pic for representation)
This surplus phenomenon began after UPERC’s 2019 tariff regulations sharply tightened norms for allowable expenditure like power purchase, O&M, salaries and capital investment etc. (Pic for representation)

The commission approved a consolidated annual revenue requirement (ARR) of 1,10,993.33 crore for the current financial year 2025-26, against which revenue from existing tariffs and government subsidy is expected to be 1,03,283.29 crore. This leaves a regulatory gap of 7,710.04 crore. But UPERC pointed out that the discoms are carrying a regulatory surplus of 18,592.38 crore.

“Even after fully adjusting the current year’s gap, a surplus of more than 10,000 crore will remain, and this balance will further rise next year due to carrying cost/interest,” a senior UPERC official said, adding: “This may leave the regulator not to raise tariff for at least three consecutive years more or till the regulatory surplus is fully adjusted.”

According to officials, in 2020, UPERC discovered an initial surplus of around 7,000 crore, which has since grown to 18,592.38 crore with carrying cost. This accumulated surplus has been the commission’s central basis for rejecting tariff hikes every year since 2019-20.

More interestingly, this is not the only surplus in play. A far bigger one stems from the Centre’s UDAY bailout scheme under which the UP government took over 39,133.76 crore (75%) of discom debt as of September 2015.

The commission treated this takeover as a financial gain accruing to the discoms and calculated a consumer-benefiting surplus of 13,377 crore, which with carrying cost, is now estimated to have grown close to 33,000 crore. The UPPCL has challenged both this treatment and the regulatory surplus in the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL).

The discoms, however, argue that subsequent government communications modified the original UDAY commitments, especially regarding the state’s obligation to bear future losses. They say this alteration has created massive unadjusted regulatory assets of over 68,000 crore payable to them.

The Tribunal’s eventual decision will determine whether these amounts must be passed on to consumers. The UPERC, in its latest tariff order, has emphasised that five consecutive tariff orders, FY 2020-21 to FY 2024-25, are already under challenge at the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL), and any decision on the discoms’ UDAY-linked claim of 68,376.67 crore will depend entirely on APTEL’s final judgment.

For now, the existing over 18,592.38 crore regulatory surplus alone appears enough to keep tariffs unchanged for at least the next three years.

“If APTEL ultimately upholds UPERC’s treatment of both the normal surplus and the UDAY-linked adjustments, Uttar Pradesh could eventually reach a stage where annual tariff reductions become unavoidable to return accumulated consumer surplus,” pointed another official.

UP Rajya Vidyut Upbhokta Parishad chairman and CERC Central Advisory Committee member Avadhesh Kumar Verma, who has repeatedly urged UPERC to reduce tariffs annually to adjust the mounting surplus, said UP consumers could remain assured that electricity rates will not rise for many years, and may even decline.

“For the regulator, raising tariffs without adjusting surplus will mean violating its own regulations and contradicting its own findings,” he pointed out.

In its latest tariff order, the UPERC expressed the need for reducing electricity rates by 13% to offset surplus, but avoided doing so keeping discoms’ poor financial health in mind.

“If the remaining net surplus of 10,883.34 crore was to be fully adjusted, it would require a tariff reduction of nearly 13%. The commission holds that such a steep cut is not feasible, considering the discoms’ financial condition, as it could seriously affect their financial viability,” it observed in the order.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Brajendra K Parashar

Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks