...
...
Next Story

'Baseless, misconceived': Centre after Elon Musk blames Starlink hurdles in India on ‘monopolistic chokeholds’

The government said it has put in place a fair and non-discriminatory authorisation framework for all telecommunication services.

Updated on: Oct 8, 2026, 12:33:00 IST
Advertisement

The Centre on Thursday rejected SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk's allegation that Starlink was being “blocked by certain oligarchs” in India, saying the country’s regulatory framework for satellite communication services was “fair and non-discriminatory”.

Elon Musk's remark came after reports said that Starlink had submitted a new application to provide satellite communication services in India. (Reuters)
Elon Musk's remark came after reports said that Starlink had submitted a new application to provide satellite communication services in India. (Reuters)

In a statement, the Ministry of Communications said suggestions that the framework or its application was discriminatory were “baseless and misconceived”.

“A post is being circulated in social media regarding the fairness of India’s regulatory framework for satellite communication services and suggesting that it is being applied in a discriminatory manner. The Government has put in place a fair and non-discriminatory authorisation framework for all telecommunication services, including satellite communication services,” the ministry said.

"...the suggestion that the framework or its application is unfair or discriminatory is baseless and misconceived,” it added.

Also Read | Elon Musk blames Starlink hurdles in India on ‘monopolistic chokeholds’

“Security assessment as part of this process is currently under way in respect of all the three licensees,” the ministry said.

Also Read | Starlink built India setup to meet security norms, says SpaceX executive; awaits nod

The development came a day after Musk alleged that Starlink was being “blocked by certain oligarchs” in India to protect their “monopolistic chokehold” over the country. He made the remarks as the satellite internet company awaits final clearances to begin commercial services in the country.

“Unfortunately, we are being blocked by certain oligarchs in order to maintain their monopolistic chokehold on the Indian people. You can guess who they are … This is a crime against the people of India!” he said in response to a post arguing that India needs Starlink to bridge connectivity gaps in underserved areas.

Also Read | 26/11 attack and strict satellite rules: Why Starlink's security clearance is taking so long

Without naming Musk, the government said all three satellite communication licensees were currently at “broadly the same regulatory stage”.

Starlink, owned by Musk’s SpaceX, has received a GMPCS licence from the government and is awaiting security clearance and spectrum assignment before it can begin commercial services.

At the India Mobile Congress on Wednesday, Starlink vice-president Lauren Dreyer said the company had built its India operations around the country’s security requirements and established 20 gateway sites comprising hundreds of antennas. “We are ready to serve in India, once India is ready,” she said.

Deep Dive

What are the main reasons for Starlink's delay in launching services in India?

Starlink's launch in India has been delayed primarily due to the need for final security clearances and regulatory approvals, including the requirement for gateway sites and compliance with security conditions specified by the Indian government.

How has the Indian government ensured a fair regulatory framework for satellite communication services?

The Indian government has established a fair and non-discriminatory authorization framework for satellite communication services, granting licenses based on compliance with security standards and regulatory requirements for all operators, including Starlink.

Why did the government implement strict security regulations for satellite phones after the 26/11 attacks?

The government implemented strict regulations for satellite phones after the 26/11 attacks to address national security concerns, as these devices can bypass local networks, making interception and tracking difficult for authorities.
Powered ByAsk HT
 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sejal Sharma

I am a technology policy reporter with the National Political Bureau at Hindustan Times, based in New Delhi. I cover digital policy and the intersection of technology and society, focusing mainly on what's happening in India. My beat often involves tracking platform regulation, privacy, internet curbs, and the real-world impact of digital rules, among other things. Can usually be found reading government notifications so that you don't have to. I cover three key ministries: Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Ministry of Communications, and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B). I am originally from New Delhi and a graduate of the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. Over the past nine years, I have worked across television, digital and print media with The Secretariat, CNN-News18, Tiranga TV, Interesting Engineering, and now Hindustan Times. Although I am not on X, I can be reached at sejal.sharma@hindustantimes.com for tips, a chat or book recommendations. I respond fast, usually within a couple of hours. Outside of work, I enjoy playing badminton and driving my car. I am a firm believer that every trip — work or leisure — deserves a fridge magnet.

Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
Get Latest News, breaking headlines, and top India News, and today real-time updates from across the nation. Stay informed on politics, government policies, crime, Today Weather, and major developments on Hindustan Times
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks