Karnataka high court stays move to cap movie ticket prices at ₹200
The court passed the orders on petitions of the Multiplex Association of India, film production companies, and a shareholder of PVR Innox
The Karnataka high court on Tuesday stayed the state’s decision to cap movie ticket prices at ₹200. Justice Ravi Hosmani granted an interim stay, meaning the cap cannot take effect until the high court hears and decides the matter.

The court passed the order on petitions of the Multiplex Association of India, film production companies, and a shareholder of PVR Innox, challenging the imposition of a maximum limit on the price of movie theatre tickets in Karnataka.
Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi, Dhyan Chinappa, and Uday Holla represented the petitioners who contended that the cap was arbitrary, beyond legislative authority, and violated the fundamental right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). Rohatgi argued that the amendment overstepped the “parent provision, ignored differences between cinema formats, and unfairly equated luxury theatres with ordinary halls.”
The state defended its decision, telling the court that it was a policy decision made in the public interest and was well within its constitutional powers.
Additional advocate general Ismail Zabiulla argued that theatres and entertainment fell squarely under the state list, giving the government clear authority to regulate them.
The state argued the cap was introduced this month through an amendment to the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 2014, to ensure affordable access to cinema. The rule applies uniformly across the state, except for boutique or premium-format theatres with 75 seats or fewer.
ABOUT THE AUTHORAyesha ArvindAyesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More

E-Paper


