Police deployed at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar for protests against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls did not wear name tags as a “deliberate measure” to prevent them from being targeted and identified on social media, officials aware of the matter said. The measure was adopted because personnel were targeted on social media following the July 20 violence during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march, they added.
The CJP called the march after weeks of protests and a hunger strike at Jantar Mantar. Thousands of demonstrators attempted to march to Parliament demanding the resignation of the then Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan over examination paper leaks. Police used tear gas and baton-charged to disperse the crowd as protesters attempted to breach multiple layers of barricades. Videos circulating on social media appeared to show several protesters being beaten. The Delhi Police maintained that force became necessary after demonstrators turned violent.
Also Read | 'No point in participating in polls until Gyanesh Kumar resigns': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke amid SIR row
Deep Dive
Why did Delhi Police skip name tags during the Jantar Mantar protests?
What complaints have been made against police officers at the Jantar Mantar protests?
How did the Delhi Police prepare for the Jantar Mantar protests after the July incidents?
On day one of the protests against Kumar on Friday, many protesters photographed and filmed police personnel questioning why they were not wearing name tags. In videos circulated on social media, some police personnel said their tags had fallen off amid the commotion. Others said they had forgotten to attach them. Some said they had deliberately removed the tags to prevent them from coming off. Many refused to offer any explanation.
{{/usCountry}}On day one of the protests against Kumar on Friday, many protesters photographed and filmed police personnel questioning why they were not wearing name tags. In videos circulated on social media, some police personnel said their tags had fallen off amid the commotion. Others said they had forgotten to attach them. Some said they had deliberately removed the tags to prevent them from coming off. Many refused to offer any explanation.
{{/usCountry}}Officials aware of the matter said this deliberate measure was part of lessons learnt from the July 20 protests when police personnel were targeted and identified on social media.
Top officers directly involved in crowd management told their seniors in review meetings of crowd handling during the July CJP protests that they and their families were identified and targeted on social media for doing their jobs. “Many officers said their families were called out by friends or in social circles. Some officers even reported that their families had been deliberately targeted by colleagues at work and through memes on social media,” said a police officer aware of the deliberations at the review meetings.
The officers involved in crowd management were subsequently assured that no action would be taken against anyone for removing name tags if they were performing their duty within the law. “While most IPS [Indian Police Service] officers, who are easily identified by the public, chose to retain their tags at Jantar Mantar this time, many junior personnel were allowed to be on the ground without wearing their tags,” the officer said. He added that many influencers were posing as media personnel and deliberately targeting police officers.
Security forces have had a no-name-tags strategy in Left Wing Extremism-affected areas, the northeast and Jammu and Kashmir. In photographs of anti-insurgency operations, the faces of special forces personnel are blurred.
The removal of tags in Delhi drew criticism as police were accused of excesses while quelling the protests in July. Experts said there are no written rules mandating whether personnel must wear or remove their name tags. It has long been an operational practice in conflict zones to prevent them from being identified and targeted.
Many in civilian clothes claiming to be police were caught attacking protesters in July. Influencers have also identified such civilians who are not from Delhi Police.
Self-styled influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj was arrested for allegedly assaulting a 38-year-old man during the CJP protest at Jantar Mantar.
A second officer said the police specifically identified influencers posing as media personnel, unlike during the handling of the CJP protests in July. “Time will tell the role or impact of the influencers in these protests, but one should acknowledge that there is a section of influencers who are deliberately doing live sessions or recording videos to make memes. These influencers are identifying and targeting some officers. Some are also interviewing police personnel on the ground to make memes. This is why the identity cards of people posing as reporters are being checked,” the officer said.
In the run-up to the protests against Kumar, anti-riot drills and training sessions were held for police. Delhi Police and central armed police forces (CAPF) faced criticism over the use of disproportionate force against student protesters in July. Several police and CAPF personnel were caught on camera slapping and assaulting protesters, and deliberately tripping them.
Delhi Police personnel were trained to maintain their composure and avoid responding or feeling intimidated when influencers approached them with phones and questioned them. Following one such review after the July protests, the CRPF’s Rapid Action Force barred its personnel from giving interviews.