...
...
Next Story

Putin orders withdrawal of Russian forces from Syria: Here is why

President Vladimir Putin has taken the world community by surprise with his sudden order for withdrawing Russian forces from Syria even though the stated objective of fighting terrorism and the Islamic State is far from accomplished.

Updated on: Mar 15, 2016, 16:37:37 IST
Hindustan Times | By , New Delhi
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

President Vladimir Putin has taken the world community by surprise with his sudden order for withdrawing Russian forces from Syria even though the stated objective of fighting terrorism and the Islamic State is far from accomplished.

File photo shows Russian air force personnel prepare to load humanitarian cargo on board a Syrian Il-76 plane at Hmeymim airbase in Syria. (AP File Photo)
File photo shows Russian air force personnel prepare to load humanitarian cargo on board a Syrian Il-76 plane at Hmeymim airbase in Syria. (AP File Photo)

The withdrawal of Russian soldiers and jets began on Tuesday though no date was set by the Kremlin for completing the process. Putin’s announcement coincided with the resumption of peace talks in Geneva against the backdrop of a fragile ceasefire since February 27.

Some experts have suggested that Putin’s decision was driven by fears that Russia could get dragged into a prolonged conflict at a time when the country’s economy has been hit hard by the fall in oil prices. Casualties in Syria too could have swung public opinion against Putin.

Others, however, believe Putin’s Syria gambit had only one purpose – to restore Russia’s image in the eyes of the world community after the country’s disastrous intervention in eastern Ukraine, which resulted in Moscow’s isolation and tough sanctions from the US and the European Union.

If indeed Putin’s objective was to make the world community look at Russia again as a player, he appears to have succeeded.

File photo of Russian President Vladimir Putin (Centre) with Syrian President Bashar Assad (Left) in Moscow, Russia.

“Russia’s intervention has also enabled Mr Putin to show off its military might and forced the United States to treat it as an equal in securing stability in Syria,” the editorial board of The New York Times said in an opinion piece on Tuesday.

In his announcement on Monday, Putin said Russia would pull out the “main part” of its forces from Syria because the situation on the ground had changed. “I consider the mission set for the defence ministry and the armed forces on the whole has been accomplished,” he said.

Also Read | Obama, Putin discuss Russia’s planned military drawdown from Syria

Russia launched an air campaign to bolster the regime of its close ally, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, in September. As recently as January, reports suggested that Russian troops could stay in Syria “indefinitely” under an agreement signed by the two countries.

The Russian air strikes helped Syrian forces retake territory from rebels and a statement from Assad’s office said he had agreed to the withdrawal of Russian troops.

Trotting out figures to highlight Russia’s successes in Syria, defence minister Sergei Shoigu said his country had “managed to cease the supply of resources to terrorists and destroy more than 2,000 militants”. Syrian troops had liberated more than 400 settlements and more than 10,000 km of territory with the support of the Russian Air Force, which conducted more than 9,000 sorties, he added.

But clearly, the five-year-old conflict in Syria is far from over. The IS remains a potent force and Russia is hedging its bets by retaining a presence at the airbase in Hmeymim and the naval base in Tartus.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Rezaul H Laskar

Rezaul Hasan Laskar is Foreign Editor with the Hindustan Times, which he joined in 2015. He began as a journalist in his hometown of Shillong in northeast India and has worked in newspapers and wire services over the years. He moved to New Delhi in 1997 and initially focused on defence, national security, Jammu and Kashmir and the northeast, while also working of foreign policy and international relations. He has been part of the media delegation accompanying PMs on foreign visits and has reported from destinations ranging from Tibet to Ukraine. Between 2007 and 2013, he was the Press Trust of India correspondent in Pakistan, one of only two Indian journalists allowed to report from the country. He extensively covered Pakistan’s domestic politics and the life of the common people, as well as the fallout of the 2008 Mumbai attacks on India-Pakistan relations and the subsequent trial in Pakistan of the suspects involved in the attack. As part of his reportage in Pakistan, he travelled the breadth of the country, from the Swat Valley to Balochistan. Reza’s first gig in journalism was writing a weekly music column, and music – especially classic rock – remains a keen interest. He is also a movie buff and a keen photographer.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks