Office of profit case: EC will continue hearing against 21 AAP MLAs

The Delhi high court had set aside the appointment of 21 AAP MLAs as parliamentary secretaries, but the petitioner said the MLAs were enjoying the fruits of that office till their appointment was set aside.

In a major jolt to the Aam Aadmi Party, the Election Commission has ruled that it will continue hearing a plea against the party’s nearly two dozen MLAs for allegedly holding office of profit, despite the Delhi high court setting aside their appointment as parliamentary secretaries.

The 21 parliamentary secretaries were appointed by Aam Aadmi Party chief and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal. (HT FILE PHOTO)

The office of profit petition was filed against 21 AAP MLAs. Later, proceedings were dropped against Jarnail Singh after he resigned as the Rajouri Garden MLA to contest the assembly polls in Punjab.

The Election Commission order on the office of profit issue.

The EC order stated that the commission was of the “considered opinion” that the AAP MLAs did hold “de facto the office of parliamentary secretaries from March 13, 2015 to September 8, 2016”.

Election commissioner OP Rawat, who recused himself from the case after chief minister Arvind Kejriwal questioned his impartiality, has not signed on the order.

The petitioner, Prashant Patel, maintained that the high court order should have no bearing on the case being heard by the EC as the MLAs were enjoying the fruits of that office till their appointment was set aside by the high court.

On September 8, 2016, the high court set aside the appointment of the 21 AAP MLAs as parliamentary secretaries. The court had said the order to appoint them as parliamentary secretaries was given without the concurrence of the lieutenant governor.

A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal had set aside the March 13, 2015 government order after the counsel appearing for the Delhi government “conceded” that it was issued without taking concurrence or views of the LG.

The poll panel had heard the case on December 16 last before it got busy with assembly elections in five states.

On March 27, the commission had reserved its order on the issue.