Sign in

Juhi Chawla’s pleas against fine frivolous: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday termed as “frivolous” and said that it was shocked at pleas by Bollywood actress Juhi Chawla seeking waiver of 20 lakh cost imposed on them for their plea challenging 5G wireless network technology

Published on: Jul 8, 2021, 24:32:20 IST
By , New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday termed as “frivolous” and said that it was shocked at pleas by Bollywood actress Juhi Chawla seeking waiver of 20 lakh cost imposed on them for their plea challenging 5G wireless network technology.

HT Image
HT Image

Justice J R Midha, who retired from the Delhi high court on Wednesday, said that he had never seen such a frivolous application in his judicial career.

“I was shocked to see such an application. This court took a lenient view and did not issue contempt when a clear case was made out... I was inclined. You say the court had no power to impose costs (but) the court has the power to issue contempt,” the court said as it took strong exception to the application.

Chawla had filed applications for waiver of costs and replacing the word “dismissed” in the judgment with “rejected”.

The court’s reaction came after Chawla’s counsel, senior Advocate Meet Malhotra, after withdrawing the application for waiver of costs, said that costs would either be deposited in a week or ten days or legal remedies against the same would be taken.

“I’m yet to see a person in my judicial career who is not willing to pay court fees,” it added.

“On one hand you move the frivolous application and on the other hand, you withdraw the application and plaintiffs are not even willing to gracefully deposit the costs,” the court said.

The court, however, granted one week to Chawla to deposit the fine.

Advocate Deepak Khosla appearing for Chawla said that the court fee has already been deposited. Malhotra clarified that the stand was not that the costs would not be paid, and did not even press the application for its waiver.

In June, the high court had dismissed the lawsuit by Chawla and others against the setting up of 5G wireless networks in the country and slapped a cost of 20 lakh.

The court had described the plea as “defective”, “abuse of process of law” and filed for “gaining publicity”. The judge had also issued a show-cause notice to a “disruptor” who started singing songs from Chawla’s movies, halting the proceedings thrice on June 2 in the matter.

It had also asked the Delhi police to identify the person and take action against him.

An unidentified person disrupted virtual proceedings of the Delhi high court thrice on June 2... until he was muted and finally thrown off the online proceedings because the participant did not stop singing songs from popular movies of actor Juhi Chawla -- one of the plaintiffs in the plea being heard by the judges.

On his farewell on Wednesday, Justice Midha played a song from a Bollywood movie Sadak 2 as the last thanksgiving to his own life.

“The last thanksgiving I want to give is to my own life for giving me this opportunity,” he said.

At the full court reference, Midha said that he is retiring with a lot of satisfaction.

“A judge’s job is to impart justice. I’m demitting office today with the fullest satisfaction of having discharged my responsibility as per the constitution, be it the district court or this Court,” he said.

Justice Midha was appointed as an Additional judge from April 11, 2008, and a permanent judge from July 6, 2011.

He had recently given a landmark judgment that allowed the citizens to feed community or stray dogs ending a long-lasting fight between the neighbours. He also formulated Special Scheme for Motor Accident Claims and also gave a ruling that conviction of the husband for the offence of murder amounts to cruelty to the wife and held to be a valid ground for divorce.

  • Utkarsh Anand
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Utkarsh Anand

    Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.Read More