...
...
Next Story

Use of keyword ‘MakeMyTrip’ in Google ads no deception: Supreme Court

The court rejected MakeMyTrip’s argument that the keyword usage amounted to infringement or passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999

Updated on: Mar 8, 2024, 07:44:10 IST
Advertisement

The Supreme Court told the online travel agency MakeMyTrip (MMT) on Thursday that the use of the keyword “MakeMyTrip” in Google Ads was “no deception at all,” even if the search results show links and advertisements for rival travel company Booking.com.

The court refused to entertain MMT’s appeal against a December order of the Delhi high court. (Sanjay Sharma)
The court refused to entertain MMT’s appeal against a December order of the Delhi high court. (Sanjay Sharma)

The Court rejected MMT’s argument that the keyword usage amounted to infringement or passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Booking.com made the highest bid and purchased the “MakeMyTrip” keyword on the Google Ads Program, which means that anyone searching for the term would see its site on top of their search results.

Refusing to entertain MMT’s appeal against a December order of the Delhi high court, a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud observed that using the keyword cannot amount to infringement or passing off because MMT and Booking.com are two completely distinct online platforms.

“There’s no deception at all. Somebody who wants to go to MMT will not be confused at all and land at Booking.com. This isn’t a case where Booking.com is using MMT’s trademark to do its business. Second, there is no confusion. If you want to book a ticket at MMT you will never be confused by Booking.com,” the bench, also comprising justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said.

Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing MMT, argued on Thursday that Booking.com is using the trademark name of MMT to carry out its business. He added that the use of its trademarks as keywords amounts to taking advantage of the distinctive character and reputation of MMT by Booking.com, adding it is a breach under the Trade Marks Act.

Disagreeing, the bench responded: “Where is the passing off? All that it means is that you have an order of advertisers on Google. You are also shown there. You are only shown below the Booking.com. Where’s the infringement or passing off? Booking.com is not passing off as Make My Trip.”

The court added that it is not a case where Booking.com is using the trademark of MMT even as senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Google, contended that there was no infringement or passing off as long MMT also comes up whenever the keywords are typed in.

“The keywords ‘MakeMyTrip’ is behind the screen after it is typed in. You get 20 results when you type these keywords. You may even be shown a boat or a plane. There is no confusion at all,” Singhvi added.

Concurring with him, the bench told Rohatgi that the two websites are completely different, besides the fact that the main case is still pending before the single judge bench of the Delhi HC. “Even on merits, where is the case of infringement or passing off? Where is your mark being used by your competitor? These are completely distinguished marks,” the court observed.

It asked MMT to go back to HC where its suit for permanent injunction restraining Google and Booking.com from infringement of its trademarks, passing off, dilution of goodwill, unfair competition and rendition of accounts of profits or damages was still pending final adjudication.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Utkarsh Anand

Utkarsh Anand is the National Legal Editor at Hindustan Times, where he leads the newspaper's coverage of the Supreme Court, constitutional law, the judiciary and the Union law ministry. He joined Hindustan Times in 2020 after stints at Press Trust of India (PTI), The Indian Express and CNN-News18, and has over two decades of experience reporting on law, governance and public policy. His work has focussed on some of India's most consequential constitutional and legal developments, including the Supreme Court's judgments on Article 370, marriage equality, decriminalisation of homosexuality, the Babri Masjid dispute, electoral reforms and judicial appointments. He specialises in making complex legal proceedings and judgments accessible to readers while examining their wider social and political impact. Beyond daily reportage, Utkarsh has led investigative projects and enterprise reporting that have shaped public debate and prompted institutional responses. His work has received several journalism awards, including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award. As National Legal Editor, he has also played a key role in expanding Hindustan Times' legal journalism footprint, mentoring reporters and strengthening coverage across platforms. A Chevening South Asia Journalism Programme Fellow, Utkarsh regularly writes analyses on the judiciary and constitutional issues, and his reporting is widely followed by lawyers, judges, policymakers, academics and readers seeking clarity on India's evolving legal landscape.

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe