...
...
Next Story

SC rejects petitions against road widening project in tiger corridor

The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a batch of petitions by environment activists seeking its intervention to “save” a tiger corridor between Pench and Kanha wildlife parks in Madhya Pradesh

Updated on: Jan 21, 2016, 11:04:05 IST
Hindustan Times | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a batch of petitions by environment activists seeking its intervention to “save” a tiger corridor between Pench and Kanha wildlife parks in Madhya Pradesh. The petitions claimed that the big cats were being threatened by widening work on the National Highway-7, which runs through it.

The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a batch of petitions by environment activists seeking its intervention to “save” a tiger corridor between Pench and Kanha wildlife parks in Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court has refused to entertain a batch of petitions by environment activists seeking its intervention to “save” a tiger corridor between Pench and Kanha wildlife parks in Madhya Pradesh

“We need prosperity not only for animals but humans too. We also need development, and this project is meant for that,” a bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur said on Wednesday. The petitioners contended that there was no prior forest clearance for building a wider road between the two parks, home to a dwindling tiger population.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) proposes to expand a 10-km stretch of the 35-km-long highway into a four-lane road. However, the reserve forest on either side of the stretch – incidentally the setting for Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle Book – is an identified tiger corridor that provides critical genetic linkage between the tiger populations of both the reserves.

The Bombay high court (HC) had earlier stayed a National Green Tribunal order that prevented the felling of trees for road widening. Following this, the activists moved the Supreme Court against the HC order – alleging that the NHAI was violating environment laws.

However, the bench said that poaching – not road accidents – was responsible for the decline in the tiger population. It then asked the petitioners to raise their concerns before the HC.

A report by the Supreme Court-appointed Centrally Empowered Committee had stated that the Pench reserve, covering an area of 16,000 sq km, was populated by 33 tigers. It also advised against allowing heavy vehicular movement in the area because such activities could endanger wildlife.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Bhadra Sinha

Bhadra is a legal correspondent and reports Supreme Court proceedings, besides writing on legal issues. A law graduate, Bhadra has extensively covered trial of high-profile criminal cases. She has had a short stint as a crime reporter too.

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather and major national developments.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe