...
...
Next Story

Assaulter can’t be held guilty if death is due to lack of treatment: Bombay high court

Justice VM Deshpande has set aside the conviction of three agriculturists, for culpable homicide not amounting to murder as one of the two villagers they had assaulted died mainly owing to lack of treatment

Updated on: Jun 18, 2019, 12:50:58 IST
Hindustan Times, Mumbai | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Bombay high court (HC) has ruled that a person, who assaults another man or woman, cannot be held responsible for causing the death of the victim if he or she dies primarily owing to lack of proper treatment.

The Bombay high court  has ruled that a person, who assaults another man or woman, cannot be held responsible for causing the death if death is due to improper management of the injury. (Bhushan Koyande / HT Photo)
The Bombay high court has ruled that a person, who assaults another man or woman, cannot be held responsible for causing the death if death is due to improper management of the injury. (Bhushan Koyande / HT Photo)

Justice VM Deshpande has set aside the conviction of three agriculturists, Hari Giri and his brothers Tulsiram and Rameshwar from Washim district, for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and the five-year prison term they were sentenced to as one of the two villagers they had assaulted died mainly owing to lack of treatment. The judge, however, upheld their conviction for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons and sentenced them to three years’ imprisonment.

On December 14, 1999, the trio had assaulted two of their fellow villagers, Raju and Ambadas, with bamboo sticks and an axe. Both the injured were treated at a local hospital and a complaint was registered. The police added section 302 (murder) of the IPC to the case after Ambadas died a fortnight later. The trio was arrested and on January 15, 2005, the additional sessions judge at Washim convicted them for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and sentenced them to five years in jail. They were also convicted for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons.

Justice Deshpande noted that Rathod had opined that such injury to the brain can result in death in 10 to 15 days after the incident if it remains untreated, the judge noted. “I am of the opinion that Ambadas expired due to improper management of the injury… Therefore, the present prosecution case can’t travel beyond offence under section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons) read with section 34 of IPC.”

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe