In a relief to deputy chairman of the Legislative Council and Shiv Sena MLC Neelam Gorhe, the Bombay high court (HC) dismissed a petition by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLC Gopichand Padalakar from Sangli, wherein he challenged her appointment.

Padalkar had sought setting aside of Gorhe’s appointment, claiming that the election on September 8, 2020, was illegal and arbitrary, and had sought re-election. The court, however, held that ex facie there was no gross illegality or unconstitutionality in the action of choosing Gorhe as deputy chairman as she enjoyed the support of a majority of the members.
The division bench of justice Nitin Jamdar and justice Milind Jadhav, while hearing Padalkar’s petition, was informed by senior counsel Milind Sathe and advocate Prahlad Paranjpe that on September 4, 2020, the Legislative Council had issued a general notice announcing that it would be in session on September 7 and 8, and would fill up the position of deputy chairman which was vacant since April 2020. The notice also stipulated that only those who tested negative for Covid-19 would be permitted to attend the session.
Padalkar submitted that as he had tested positive for the coronavirus, he could not participate in electing the deputy chairman. He argued that as the provision for issuance of the September 4 notice was not followed, it made the notice illegal and the election process unconstitutional.
{{/usCountry}}Padalkar submitted that as he had tested positive for the coronavirus, he could not participate in electing the deputy chairman. He argued that as the provision for issuance of the September 4 notice was not followed, it made the notice illegal and the election process unconstitutional.
{{/usCountry}}However, advocate-general Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, representing the state, opposed the plea and submitted that the validity of any proceeding in the Council could not be disputed on the grounds of any irregularity of procedure. He further argued that the petitioner was unable to participate in the election process due to peculiar circumstances and not by any action of the respondents. Kumbhakoni concluded that no interference of the HC was warranted, and hence, the petition should be dismissed.
After hearing the submissions, the bench noted, “There is no merit in this challenge. Even to consider the challenge on this count, prejudice flowing from the same should be ex facie apparent. The petitioner is calling upon the court to undertake an inquiry into the propriety of the procedure adopted by the Legislative Council, which is impermissible in view of the Constitution of India.” The court then dismissed the petition.
Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.