...
...
Next Story

Bombay high court allows disqualified corporator to re-contest the Bhiwandi municipal polls

According to rules, Nooruddin Nizamuddin Ansari was not supposed to re-contesting for the next six years.

Updated on: May 23, 2017, 20:03:13 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Mumbai
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Bombay high court has granted relief to a Samajwadi Party corporator and permitted him to file his nomination for the upcoming Bhiwandi municipal polls despite the fact that he was disqualified in 2013.

A bench led by Justice KK Tated granted relief to Ansari, who had filed his nomination as the Samajwadi Party candidate in the upcoming elections at Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation. (HT)
A bench led by Justice KK Tated granted relief to Ansari, who had filed his nomination as the Samajwadi Party candidate in the upcoming elections at Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation. (HT)

According to rules, Nooruddin Nizamuddin Ansari was not supposed to re-contesting for the next six years.

A bench led by Justice KK Tated granted relief to Ansari, who had filed his nomination as the Samajwadi Party candidate in the upcoming elections at Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal Corporation.

Ansari’s nomination was rejected by the returning officer after it came to light that in May 2013, he had been a corporator from the Congress party and had been disqualified for defying the party whip.

While his term as the Congress corporator would have come to an end in April 2017, earlier last year, the state government implemented an amendment that said if a councillor or member of a political party was disqualified from his or her post, he or she would not hold the same post for six years from the date of disqualification.

Ansari, however, approached the high court through his counsel, advocate S M Gorwadkar, claiming that since his disqualification had come into effect in 2013, three years before the amendment, the six-year rule did not apply to his case.

While the state election commission opposed Ansari’s plea in the court, arguing that the “court must not interfere in the issue,” the vacation bench noted that the issue needed further examination and so, the candidate be allowed to contest the elections.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ayesha Arvind

Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor, specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She tracks high courts and tribunals, bringing key legal developments and their broader impact to the forefront.

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe