...
...
Next Story

Bombay high court sentences lawyer in jail for creating ruckus in court, threatening the judge

Ramchandran Kagne, the accused lawyer, was the defence counsel for a man accused of raping a minor girl.

Updated on: Sep 5, 2018, 00:42:20 IST
Hindustan Times | By , MUMBAI
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Bombay high court (HC) recently sentenced a 55-year-old lawyer from Parbhani, who threatened and tried to stop a trial court judge from sentencing his rape accused client, to simple imprisonment for a week.

The HC held the lawyer, who has 18 years of practice to his credit, guilty of interfering with the administration of justice. (HT FILE)
The HC held the lawyer, who has 18 years of practice to his credit, guilty of interfering with the administration of justice. (HT FILE)

Ramchandran Kagne was the defence counsel for a man accused of raping a minor girl. On October 7, 2005, after recording evidence, the ad-hoc additional sessions judge of the trial court, Ashok Bilolikar, started to dictate the judgment in the open court, holding the accused guilty. The judge then asked the accused to put forth his say on the quantum of sentence. Angry, Kagne got up and started shouting at the judge. He snatched the writing pad of the stenographer and flung it in court, which hit assistant public prosecutor RR Sharma in his face.

A court peon brought back the writing pad and handed it over to the stenographer. Kagne snatched it and flung it again. He then threatened the judge, daring him to pronounce the sentence.

“Interference in the administration of justice by giving threats, snatching the diary and addressing the judicial officer in a loud voice are definitely serious acts, more so when such acts are carried out by an advocate who is the officer of the court,” said a division bench of justice TV Nalawade and justice Vibha Kankanwadi, while convicting Kagne.

The division bench said under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, fine is a rule and imprisonment an exception. “We have no doubt in our minds that this is an exceptional case involving an advocate who is the officer of the court. Obstruction in the judicial process by an advocate cannot be tolerated.”

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe