Ukraine’s fatal miscalculation: Zelensky believes he can handle what comes after Oreshnik and Kedr?

Has Vladimir Putin just rejected what Ukraine claims was Russia’s best chance for a favorable peace deal? A new war of words has erupted between Kyiv and Moscow after Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha declared that Putin had “missed his chance” to end the war by refusing fresh negotiations and rejecting Volodymyr Zelensky’s proposal for direct face-to-face talks. Kyiv is now arguing that time is no longer on Russia’s side and that the military, economic and diplomatic costs of the war will only continue to grow. The remarks came as Zelensky met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, with Europe stepping up efforts to shape the next phase of the conflict. The London talks focused on a possible ceasefire and broader peace efforts, while European leaders backed direct Ukraine-Russia dialogue with U.S. involvement. At the same time, tensions are rising over Ukraine’s growing long-range strike ambitions. Zelensky suggested that Kyiv is close to fielding a ballistic missile capable of hitting targets inside Russia, a development that could add a new dimension to the conflict. Some analysts believe Ukraine is attempting to increase pressure on Moscow, while others warn that the move risks provoking a stronger Russian response. Meanwhile, Russia dismissed Zelensky’s public appeal for talks, with senior officials arguing that the Ukrainian leader’s open letter showed Kyiv had “no other option.” Donald Trump also weighed in, saying he “doesn’t mind” if Putin and Zelensky meet in person, adding another layer to the diplomatic debate. Is Russia really losing leverage? Has Europe found a new opening for peace? And what happens if diplomacy fails while both sides continue to escalate? This report examines the latest diplomatic confrontation, the growing pressure campaign against Moscow, Europe’s renewed peace push, and why the next few months could prove critical for the future of the war.