...
...
Next Story

Dilemma of marriage: the tricky issue of surname

Updated on: May 18, 2014, 12:02:16 IST
Hindustan Times | By
Prefer HTon Google
Seema-Goswami
Seema-Goswami
Advertisement

What's in a name? Ask a woman who is about to get married to know the answer. Whether she uses her father's surname or her husband's, it is the woman who matters, says Seema Goswami.

A fortnight ago, in solidarity with a recently married friend who was getting grief from her in-laws about not changing her last name to that of her husband's, I tweeted, "If a woman chooses to retain the surname she was born with, it is her choice surely? Why should anyone else get their knickers in a twist?"



It is a testament to our highly politicised times that most people chose to read this as a 'spirited defence' of Priyanka's decision to be known as 'Gandhi' rather than 'Vadra'.



This was such a bizarre extrapolation that I didn't quite know how to respond. First off, Priyanka Gandhi (or Vadra, if you will) was nowhere on my inner radar when I wrote this. I was purely motivated by the irritation of my friend who didn't quite know how to get her in-laws off her back; and by my annoyance that in the 21st century, such an absurd demand was being made of a woman. And then there was that other minor detail: that Priyanka Gandhi had, in fact, embraced the surname Vadra as her own from the moment she got married.



http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/popup/2014/5/18052014_HTBrunch_pg18.jpg





I was a witness to that at a diplomatic reception held soon after. Introduced to an American diplomat as 'Priyanka Gandhi' she shook her head firmly and said, "It's Priyanka Vadra now." And that's how she has chosen to style herself ever since. Which is why I have been mystified by the fact that Smriti Irani has been getting flak about addressing Priyanka as "Mrs Vadra" during her campaign in Amethi. Irani may well be doing it to make a political point, but my guess is Priyanka doesn't regard being called by her married name as some sort of mortal insult.



But the kind of responses that my tweet elicited got me thinking about the politics of changing surnames after marriage. On the whole, women from famous political families don't tend to do that. Benazir Bhutto may have tagged on Zardari after her name but she would always be known by the name of her famous father. The Aung San in Suu Kyi's name comes from her father; the Burmese leader has never been known as Mrs Aris (after her English husband, Michael). Chelsea Clinton is still known as 'Clinton' rather than by her married name of 'Mezvinsky'.







And no matter how many times Priyanka may say she is 'Mrs Vadra', the only people who refuse to address her as 'Gandhi' are her political rivals.



But even outside of the sphere of politics, the politics of name-changing rules. Adopt your husband's surname when you get married and the feminist brigade looks down upon you as a traitor to their cause. Keep the surname you were born with and the traditionalists frown upon your choice. (Both Hillary Rodham and Cherie Booth were forced by the demands of electoral politics in USA and the UK to restyle themselves as Hillary Clinton and Cherie Blair.) If your birth surname is a famous one (like Bhutto or Gandhi, for instance) you are accused of trading on your lineage. If your husband's last name is more famous than yours (Murdoch rather than Deng) then your name change is put down to opportunism.



http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/popup/2014/5/18052014_HTBrunch_pg18b.jpg
 
Catch your daily dose of Fashion, Taylor Swift, Health, Festivals, Travel, Relationship, Recipe and all the other Latest Lifestyle News on Hindustan Times Website and APPs.
Catch your daily dose of Fashion, Taylor Swift, Health, Festivals, Travel, Relationship, Recipe and all the other Latest Lifestyle News on Hindustan Times Website and APPs.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON