...
...
Next Story

No consensus on GST; 21 states can start borrowing

Briefing reporters after the meeting, council chairperson and Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman late on Monday said: “We were not able to arrive at a consensus.”

Updated on: Oct 13, 2020, 04:40:59 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council on Monday failed to arrive at a consensus on borrowing to meet the revenue shortfall of 2.35 lakh crore in the current financial year, paving the way for a majority of states to start borrowing from the market, even as some dissenting states indicated they would weigh legal options.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman arrives at her office before leaving for parliament to present the federal budget in New Delhi. (REUTERS/ File photo)
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman arrives at her office before leaving for parliament to present the federal budget in New Delhi. (REUTERS/ File photo)

Briefing reporters after the meeting, council chairperson and Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman late on Monday said: “We were not able to arrive at a consensus.” She added that neither the Centre nor the council could stop states from borrowing if they chose so.

She said that the majority of states were willing to borrow, and the Centre was committed to facilitating them. An official present at the meeting said on condition of anonymity that 21 states opted for the first borrowing option of 1.1 lakh crore. Ten states rejected the borrowing plan, and insisted that the Centre should borrow the entire amount, compensate states fully for their GST shortfall and repay the loan from the compensation cess levies on sin products and luxury goods.

The finance minister from another dissenting state said on condition of anonymity: “This is not good for cooperative federalism. The chairperson rejected our demand to evoke the dispute resolution clause provided in the GST Act. All options are open. Even dialogue is an option. It is unfortunate that the matter could not be resolved even after a series of matter.”

Monday’s was the third meeting of the council since August 27 (41st meeting), when the Centre gave two borrowing options to states to compensate them for the 2.35 lakh crore shortfall in their share of revenue from the indirect tax this fiscal year. Two days after the 41st meeting of the council, the Centre circulated detailed terms of the two borrowing options to states.

The first option allowed states to borrow only 97,000 crore (later raised to 1.10 lakh crore) on account of the GST implementation, but exempted them from paying either the principal or interest. Under the second option, states could borrow the entire shortfall of 2.35 lakh crore, which included revenue losses arising from the Covid-19 pandemic, but they would have to bear significant interest costs.

Option 1 provided for payment of interest and the principal from the compensation cess levied on luxury products and sin goods such as liquor, cigarettes, aerated water, automobiles, coal and tobacco products. In Option 2, only the principal was to be paid from the compensation fund. While 21 states communicated their preference for the first option, 10 states ruled by non-National Democratic Alliance (NDA) parties rejected the plan. Under this background, the 42nd meeting of the council took place on October 5.

 
Stay updated with the latest Business News, stock market updates, petrol and diesel prices, gold and silver rates, income tax updates and major developments from India and across the world.
Stay updated with the latest Business News, stock market updates, petrol and diesel prices, gold and silver rates, income tax updates and major developments from India and across the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe