In a bid to avert any possible linkage with the Satyam Computers scandal, state-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) has decided to drop a proposal to acquire a 10 per cent stake in Larsen and Toubro (L&T). L&T currently owns 12 per cent of Satyam.

In a December 18, 2008 letter, ONGC chairman and managing director RS Sharma informed the petroleum ministry about a proposal — emerging out of its December 1 board meeting — to acquire UTI’s holding in L&T.
As on December 31, 2008, UTI held 8.9 per cent of L&T.
“UTI, which is holding around 10 per cent shares of L&T, is on a lookout for a buyer,” the letter stated. “In view of the fact that L&T has regular business relations with ONGC, it could explore the possibility of strategic investment in L&T.”
At L&T's market capitalisation of Rs 46,000 crore in December 2008, the proposal would have meant an investment of around $1 billion (approximately Rs 4,800 crore at today’s exchange rate) by ONGC, which is currently sitting on a cash surplus of over Rs 20,000 crore.
“We were never serious about buying a stake in L&T,” Sharma told Hindustan Times. “It was just a suggestion made by an independent director while reviewing avenues of investing the company's surplus funds.”
{{/usCountry}}“We were never serious about buying a stake in L&T,” Sharma told Hindustan Times. “It was just a suggestion made by an independent director while reviewing avenues of investing the company's surplus funds.”
{{/usCountry}}While Sharma refused to name the independent director, sources said it was V.P. Singh, former chairman, IFCI.
On what led to the backtracking by ONGC on this proposal, a senior official who did not wish to be named said, “Around the time the proposal was mooted, the Satyam scam unfolded. Later, talks of L&T taking over Satyam also began.”
Fearing that a proposal to pick up a stake in L&T could link ONGC with the ongoing Satyam fiasco, the company decided to drop this proposal, the official said.
ONGC informed its board that it was not pursuing the L&T proposal as it would be seen more as a financial investment than a strategic one. Further, following L&T’s involvement in Satyam, “such a opportunity should be best ignored.”