A local court on Monday acquitted member of Parliament (MP) from Ludhiana Ravneet Singh Bittu in a 2011 case of violation of prohibitory order, as the prosecution could not produce enough evidence to prove its case.

The case dates back to March 17, 2011, when Bittu was booked for allegedly taking out a procession and raising slogans in Chandigarh in violation of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) imposed by the deputy commissioner (DC). Section 144 prohibits assembly of more than four persons in an area.
A case under Section 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was registered against Bittu at the Sector-11 police station for allegedly taking out a procession of over 200 workers of Youth Congress and gathering near gate number 1 of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER).
The case came on the complaint of the then UT police sub-inspector Eram Rizvi, and charges were framed against Bittu on February 2 last year.
EVIDENCE INADEQUATE
{{/usCountry}}EVIDENCE INADEQUATE
{{/usCountry}}In the court, defence counsel Terminder Singh contested that Bittu was falsely implicated in the case. He argued that the alleged order of DC was not with the prosecution or Rizvi, nor was it published in any newspaper.
Terminder argued that no independent witness was examined from whom the order passed by the DC was received. He added that even the original FIR was not produced during the trial.
After hearing the arguments, the court acquitted Bittu, who said, “I had full faith in the judiciary. Truth has prevailed and justice has been done by the court.”