...
...
Next Story

Chandigarh: Realtor’s appeal junked, elderly homebuyer to get 20 lakh refund

The District Consumer Commission-I partly allowed her complaint in March 2025 and directed Godrej to refund the ₹20 lakh with 9% simple interest from the respective dates of deposit

Published on: Aug 29, 2026, 08:26:20 IST
Advertisement

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh, has upheld an order directing Godrej Properties to refund 20 lakh to an 84-year-old homebuyer, along with 9% annual interest, 20,000 compensation for mental agony and harassment, and 10,000 towards litigation costs. The commission dismissed the real estate company’s appeal with costs of 5,000.

The commission held that a party which has been duly served but chooses not to participate cannot later claim that it was denied an opportunity of hearing. (HT File)
The commission held that a party which has been duly served but chooses not to participate cannot later claim that it was denied an opportunity of hearing. (HT File)

The commission also directed the release of two deposits of 12 lakh each made in favour of the complainant, Shivdarshan Sharma. The amounts, along with accrued interest, are to be transferred to her through RTGS after completion of necessary formalities.

Sharma had booked a 3BHK apartment in Godrej Zenith, Sector 89, Gurugram, and paid 20 lakh in two instalments in March 2024. She alleged that despite booking a 3BHK unit, a 2BHK was allotted to her due to an inadvertent error. After repeated requests for correction allegedly failed, she sought a refund of the booking amount.

The District Consumer Commission-I partly allowed her complaint in March 2025 and directed Godrej to refund the 20 lakh with 9% simple interest from the respective dates of deposit. It also awarded 20,000 compensation and 10,000 litigation costs.

The commission held that a party which has been duly served but chooses not to participate cannot later claim that it was denied an opportunity of hearing. It rejected Godrej’s plea for remand and said the company had failed to provide any plausible explanation for its non-appearance.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe