...
...
Next Story

HC directs consortium of NLUs to revise merit list for CLAT UG-2026

But the court clarified that students who had already taken admission during the first round of counselling will not be disturbed

Published on: Feb 4, 2026, 22:36:58 IST
Advertisement

PRAYAGRAJ The Allahabad high court on Tuesday directed the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLUs) to revise the merit list for CLAT UG-2026, which was held on December 7, 2025, after an answer key dispute. But it clarified that students who had already taken admission during the first round of counselling will not be disturbed.

While the court refused to interfere with questions 6 and 13, the bench found merit regarding the challenge to question no. 9, a logical reasoning question and directed that both ‘B’ and ‘D’ options must be treated as the correct answer. (File Photo)
While the court refused to interfere with questions 6 and 13, the bench found merit regarding the challenge to question no. 9, a logical reasoning question and directed that both ‘B’ and ‘D’ options must be treated as the correct answer. (File Photo)

Justice Vivek Saran partly allowed a petition filed by Avneesh Gupta, a candidate who appeared in CLAT exams. The court passed the order as the high-powered ‘Oversight Committee’ had arbitrarily overruled subject matter experts regarding a disputed question without assigning any reasons for the same.

The petitioner, who took the test, moved the HC challenging the answer key for question nos. 6, 9 and 13 of test booklet-C (corresponding to questions 88, 91 and 95 of master booklet-A).

While the court refused to interfere with questions 6 and 13, the bench found merit regarding the challenge to question no. 9, a logical reasoning question and directed that both ‘B’ and ‘D’ options must be treated as the correct answer.

The court noted that the ‘Oversight Committee’ had overruled the decision of the expert committee and had retained the correct option as answer ‘B’ for the aforesaid question without assigning any reasons.

“Since it has been informed at the Bar that the first round of counselling has already been finalised thus the students/candidates who have already taken admission pursuant to the first round of counselling shall not be disturbed, however for further counselling, the respondent is directed to act on the revised/re-notified merit list,” added the court.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe