...
...
Next Story

Lucknow blaze: Bus ran sans valid permit; emergency doors were ‘blocked’

Lucknow bus fire kills five, exposing illegal operations and safety violations by private buses. Authorities face scrutiny over permit and inspection failures.

Published on: May 17, 2025, 09:22:13 IST
Advertisement

The deadly fire in a bus in Lucknow on Thursday laid bare the rampant violations of not just permit conditions but also of critical safety and technical norms by private buses operating illegally as stage carriages. Five people—two of whom were children—were killed in the mishap.

(File)
(File)

Despite securing contract carriage or tourist permits, these buses brazenly pick up and drop off passengers at multiple destinations — a practice that has been continuing unchecked for years with UP State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC), which alone is authorised to operate buses on notified highways and expressways, failing to cater the demand.

In the latest case, the ill-fated bus obtained a special permit from Baghpat on May 10. The permit was valid till May 15. The bus obtained a temporary permit earlier, too, on several occasions. The bus, bearing registration no. UP17 AT6372, met with the accident on the Kisan Path resulting in the death of five passengers and injuries to 13 others. The fire was said to be caused by an electrical short circuit. Starting from Begusarai in Bihar, the bus was bound for Delhi.

“Hundreds of private buses, including double-decker, operate on highways and expressways, especially in the night. Since as per rules, they cannot get stage carriage permits to operate on routes that are reserved for UPSRTC, they obtain short-term contract carriage permits to operate on daily basis,” he explained. “The bus that caught fire on Thursday also violated the terms and conditions of the permit,” he claimed.

Gangalphal, a retired additional commissioner of Road Safety, said, “A bus with a contract carriage permit is not allowed to pick up or drop off passengers at multiple locations like stage carriages (e.g., public buses). It is meant for transporting a specific group of passengers as per a pre-arranged contract from one point to another without picking up or dropping off other passengers along the route.”

However, a tourist permit, according to him, may allow some flexibility, especially for sightseeing tours or pre-planned itineraries, but it still cannot operate as a regular public transport service.

Minister for transport, Daya Shankar Singh said the ill-fated bus had obtained temporary or contract permits several times after 2023. Before it had the national permit.

“We have asked the officials to probe as to why it got temporary permits multiple times when it had the national permit till 2023, and also if the bus violated the terms and conditions of the permit and fix the accountability of the officers concerned,” he said.

The initial inquiry has also revealed that a seat placed near the emergency exit blocked the escape route for passengers, violating safety specifications that mandate the area to be clear. It made the escape for trapped passengers impossible. Despite such blatant violations of technical norms, these buses manage to secure registration and continue operating without being caught.

“It is surprising how the bus got the fitness certificate if the emergency gate was blocked due to the seating arrangement,” the minister said.

Principal secretary Amit Kumar Gupta said a detailed investigation into the issue was on, and action would be taken against the guilty after the report came.

Transport commissioner Brajesh Narain Singh said the vehicle’s fitness certificate was issued without physical inspection under the ‘Anywhere Fitness’ system. “Regional inspector Raghav Kumar Kushwaha has been suspended, and a departmental inquiry is underway, led by Varanasi RTO Shikhar Ojha. A three-member state-level committee, headed by additional transport commissioner Sanjay Singh will review all fitness certificates issued in the past year under this system,” he said.

The transport department, he said, was implementing ‘5E road safety model’. The 5E stands for engineering, enforcement, education, emergency Care and environment. It has also signed an MoU with IIT Kharagpur to analyse road accident causes and suggest improvements.

He, however, refused to comment on whether the bus also violated the terms and conditions of the permit, saying only the state transport authority chairman could respond to the query.

But for the families of victims of Thursday’s fire, such measures offer little solace. “When buses with blocked emergency exits and dubious permits can still secure fitness certificates, it’s not just a lapse — it’s complicity,” said another transport department official.

He pointed out that accidents involving private buses operating in violation of all the norms had become so routine with authorities not technical specifications to these buses at the time of their registration and later during periodical fitness inspection.”

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Brajendra K Parashar

Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks