...
...
Next Story

No power to ban caste-based rallies during non-election period: ECI to Allahabad HC

ECI filed its response before the Lucknow bench of Allahabad HC in reply to a petition filed by advocate Moti Lal Yadav in 2013 seeking directives from the court to the ECI to derecognise such political parties that held caste-based rallies

Published on: Mar 14, 2023, 23:36:47 IST
Advertisement

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has submitted before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court that it has no jurisdiction to ban caste-based rallies of political parties organised during non-election period and nor does it have the power to ban such parties from contesting subsequent elections.

The ECI also submitted before the court that its model code of conduct has set of rules to prohibit campaigning or seeking votes on the basis of caste, creed or religion. (For Representation)
The ECI also submitted before the court that its model code of conduct has set of rules to prohibit campaigning or seeking votes on the basis of caste, creed or religion. (For Representation)

The ECI filed its response before the high court on February 16 in reply to a petition filed by advocate Moti Lal Yadav. Yadav had filed the petition in 2013 seeking directives from the court to the ECI to derecognise such political parties that held caste-based rallies.

Hearing the plea that year, the high court had issued notices to the ECI and political parties. The court had also issued interim directions to the ECI to ban all such caste-based rallies in Uttar Pradesh. However, after the ECI failed to file reply till November 2022, the high court issued a fresh notice to the poll panel.

The ECI filed its reply on February 16 this year. In the affidavit submitted before the court, the poll panel has submitted that “it has no jurisdiction to restrict the convening of meetings and rallies on caste lines by political parties during non-election period and to ban them from contesting subsequent election.”

The petitioner had also made political parties, including the BJP, the SP, the BSP and the Congress, and both the state and the central governments respondents. The ECI also submitted before the court that the petition was misconceived and legally not maintainable.

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Pawan Dixit

Pawan Dixit, Assistant Editor, brings over 20 years of frontline reporting experience to the newsroom. A specialist on Uttar Pradesh politics and governance, he has reported from the ground across the state’s most consequential stories. He cut his teeth in eastern UP, spending 15 years covering the region. Based in Varanasi, he reported the 2012 UP Assembly polls and the 2014 Lok Sabha elections that reshaped the state’s political map. Moving to Lucknow in 2016, he has since led coverage of the 2017 and 2022 UP Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. His reporting tracks the BJP’s strategy, opposition moves, and voter sentiment across all 75 districts. Pawan has been a constant presence in Ayodhya since 2016. He reported the entire arc of the Ram Mandir movement — from the legal fight to the Supreme Court verdict, through temple construction, to the inauguration. He continues to track every development at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. On the state beat, he covers the BJP, the Industrial Development Department, and handles key outstation political assignments. He also reports major cases from the district court, Lucknow bench of the High Court, and the State Information Commission. Along with this, he also reports on NGT's important decisions related to UP. Known for sharp sourcing and clear analysis, Pawan connects politics, policy, infrastructure and faith — the forces driving UP today. He has reported developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir movement since 2016. The Supreme Court's Ram Mandir verdict, temple construction and the its opening have been reported by him. He reports all developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir Trust. He covers state BJP, Industrial development department, outstation political assignments, reports special cases from district court, high court and state information commission

SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Notifications

Get breaking alerts directly from the newsroom

Notifications are on!You'll be notified when news breaks