Sign in

Sexual harassment of badminton players: Pocso court awards jail terms to son and father

The court also ordered that around two and a half years of prison term already served by Vijay Sinha will be deducted from his sentence

Updated on: Dec 7, 2024, 07:46:08 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

LUCKNOW The court of special judge (Pocso Act) on Friday awarded a seven-year prison term to former working secretary of the Uttar Pradesh Badminton Association (UPBA) Nishant Sinha and a five-year term to his father and former secretary of the UPBA Vijay Sinha in a January 2017 case related to sexual harassment of female badminton players of Babu Banarasi Das Uttar Pradesh Badminton Academy. The court also imposed a fine of 50,000 each on them.

Additional district judge Vijendra Tripathi, who is special judge (Pocso Act), pronounced the verdict and ordered the cops to take the duo into custody and send them to prison. (Pic for representation)
Additional district judge Vijendra Tripathi, who is special judge (Pocso Act), pronounced the verdict and ordered the cops to take the duo into custody and send them to prison. (Pic for representation)

The father-son duo was sentenced under various sections of the Pocso Act.

Additional district judge Vijendra Tripathi, who is special judge (Pocso Act), pronounced the verdict and ordered the cops to take the duo into custody and send them to prison.

The court also ordered that around two and a half years of prison term already served by Vijay Sinha will be deducted from his sentence. Currently, both father and son were out on bail.

The then chief security officer of the BBD Uttar Pradesh Badminton Academy, Jang Bahadur Singh, had on February 20, 2017, lodged an FIR against Vijay Sinha and his son Nishant at the Gomti Nagar police station. He accused the father-son duo of extorting money from players of the academy and accused the son of sexually exploiting some of the female players.

The court found Vijay Sinha guilty under Sections 10, 16/17 of Pocso Act, along with sections 354-A /109 of the IPC. Nishant was found guilty under Section 9 (F)/10 of the Pocso Act and Section 354-A of the IPC.

“The prosecution presented nine witnesses in the case. Three of them were victims (minor girls), one male badminton player, security officer and a physiotherapist,” said advocate Manoj Tripathi, district government counsel (crime).

Two sub inspectors, who were investigating officers, and another SI, were also witnesses in the case, he added.

Advocate Abhishek Upadhyay, who represented the state government in court, said: “The prosecution proved all charges beyond doubt in the court. After the court announced the verdict, both father and son were taken into custody and sent to jail.”

Upadhyay added that it took eight years to pronounce the verdict as the accused had challenged proceedings of the trial court several times in the Supreme Court.

  • Pawan Dixit
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Pawan Dixit

    Pawan Dixit, Assistant Editor, brings over 20 years of frontline reporting experience to the newsroom. A specialist on Uttar Pradesh politics and governance, he has reported from the ground across the state’s most consequential stories. He cut his teeth in eastern UP, spending 15 years covering the region. Based in Varanasi, he reported the 2012 UP Assembly polls and the 2014 Lok Sabha elections that reshaped the state’s political map. Moving to Lucknow in 2016, he has since led coverage of the 2017 and 2022 UP Assembly elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. His reporting tracks the BJP’s strategy, opposition moves, and voter sentiment across all 75 districts. Pawan has been a constant presence in Ayodhya since 2016. He reported the entire arc of the Ram Mandir movement — from the legal fight to the Supreme Court verdict, through temple construction, to the inauguration. He continues to track every development at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. On the state beat, he covers the BJP, the Industrial Development Department, and handles key outstation political assignments. He also reports major cases from the district court, Lucknow bench of the High Court, and the State Information Commission. Along with this, he also reports on NGT's important decisions related to UP. Known for sharp sourcing and clear analysis, Pawan connects politics, policy, infrastructure and faith — the forces driving UP today. He has reported developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir movement since 2016. The Supreme Court's Ram Mandir verdict, temple construction and the its opening have been reported by him. He reports all developments in Ayodhya and Ram Mandir Trust. He covers state BJP, Industrial development department, outstation political assignments, reports special cases from district court, high court and state information commissionRead More