Kunal Kamra’s plea: No notification on fact-checking unit before July 5, Centre tells HC
The ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) on Thursday told the Bombay high court that a notification for setting up the proposed fact-checking unit (FCU), which is purportedly to regulate content on social media, would not be issued before July 5
The ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) on Thursday told the Bombay high court that a notification for setting up the proposed fact-checking unit (FCU), which is purportedly to regulate content on social media, would not be issued before July 5.
The statement came in response to a petition filed by satirist Kunal Kamra, which has challenged a recent amendment to the Information Technology Rules, 2023, saying it would give unfettered power to the FCU to direct intermediaries like Twitter and Facebook to take down content which it deems misinformation or misleading information regarding the business of the Central government or its policies and programmes. Kamra has also claimed that such powers would be detrimental to his rights to free speech guaranteed under the constitution.
Additional solicitor general Anil Singh, appearing for MeitY, informed a division bench of justice Gautam Patel and justice Neela Gokhale that the centre was willing to make a statement that a notification would not be issued till the next date of hearing.
Senior advocate Darius Khambata, representing Kamra, too sought a statement from the ministry that the amended IT Rules would not be implemented until a notification on the FCU was issued, but the bench denied his request.
{{/usCountry}}Senior advocate Darius Khambata, representing Kamra, too sought a statement from the ministry that the amended IT Rules would not be implemented until a notification on the FCU was issued, but the bench denied his request.
{{/usCountry}}However, when Khambata insisted that there should be a stay on the rules as these would violate the citizens’ rights to freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution, the court said, “We believe this is not a reason to immediately go into the question of stay or suspension of the rules, as without a FCO being notified, the rules cannot be in force.”
{{/usCountry}}However, when Khambata insisted that there should be a stay on the rules as these would violate the citizens’ rights to freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution, the court said, “We believe this is not a reason to immediately go into the question of stay or suspension of the rules, as without a FCO being notified, the rules cannot be in force.”
{{/usCountry}}The bench also directed MeitY to submit by June 6 a list of judgements of the Supreme Court and high courts pertaining to the IT Rules and the powers of the legislature to implement them.
{{/usCountry}}The bench also directed MeitY to submit by June 6 a list of judgements of the Supreme Court and high courts pertaining to the IT Rules and the powers of the legislature to implement them.
{{/usCountry}}The court also asked the Centre to file an affidavit in response to the petition on June 8, the next date of hearing.
Kamra has challenged the validity of the amended rules 3(i)(II)(A) and (C) for being ultra vires to section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and violative of the principles enshrined in articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the constitution.
The rules cast an obligation upon intermediaries of making “reasonable efforts to cause users to not publish, display, upload or share information in respect of business of the Central government that is identified as fake, false or misleading by such FCU of the Central government as the MeitY may specify”, the petition filed through advocate Meenaz Kakalia on April 10 said.
Kamra has contended that the rules do not define the term “business of the Central government”. He has also expressed apprehension over misuse of the term “reasonable efforts”, stating that the intermediary may simply take down the content if the government’s FCU identifies it as fake, or make it unavailable for users in India.
The satirist has also said that his “ability to engage in political satire would be unreasonably and excessively curtailed if his content were to be subjected to manifestly arbitrary, subjective fact check by a hand-picked unit designated by the Central government”. “Satire, by its very nature, does not lend to such a fact-checking exercise.”
Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.