...
...
Next Story

Plea of CFO of Nirav Modi’s company rejected by special court in Mumbai

A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court on Thursday rejected a plea filed by former chief financial officer (CFO) of Nirav Modi’s company Firestar Diamonds International Private Limited for cancellation of a look-out-circular issued against him.

Published on: Oct 15, 2021, 23:01:59 IST
By , Mumbai
Prefer HTon Google
Advertisement

A special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court on Thursday rejected a plea filed by former chief financial officer (CFO) of Nirav Modi’s company Firestar Diamonds International Private Limited for cancellation of a look-out-circular issued against him. The court observed that the investigation is still ongoing, the agency has found the prima facie, role of the present applicant in committing huge fraud.

The court, while rejecting the plea observed that in this case, it appeared that the investigation was still ongoing.
The court, while rejecting the plea observed that in this case, it appeared that the investigation was still ongoing.

The court said the look-out-circular in the matter is not issued by this court and has been issued by the investigating authority, so this court does not have any inherent jurisdiction to cancel the same.

Ravi Shankar Gupta, 53, a resident of Noida, Uttar Pradesh had approached the court in a plea to cancel the circular issued by CBI against him. However, special CBI judge AS Sayyad rejected the plea of Gupta and disposed of his application.

Sajal Yadav who argued for Gupta had told the court, “That the applicant is not related in any manner with Nirav Modi. He was appointed as the CFO of the accused company in August 2016. Prior to working with Firestar, he worked with another company. He terminated his employment with Firestar, the moment he came to know about the alleged PNB fraud and is a reputed professional for the past 26 years. He was shocked and surprised to learn about the look-out circular issued by the CBI against him, due to which he is prevented from travelling outside India and carry work.”

The application was opposed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Counsel Sumedh Wankhade.

Wankhade told the court, “There was a criminal conspiracy pursuant to which PNB was cheated. The two companies Firestar International Limited and Firestar Diamonds International Private Limited has been sanctioned credit limits by banks under consortium arrangements. In the matter of limits sanctioned to Firestar International Limited, Punjab National Bank is the lead bank and in the matter of limits sanctioned to Firestar Diamond International Private Limited, Union Bank of India is the lead bank. The bank has found that there were fraudulent transactions with these companies and firms. As per allegations in these complaints shows the intention of the accused was to cheat a consortium of banks as a whole. Gupta was CFO of Firestar International Limited and was in a key position. The investigations are still on, there is every likelihood that the applicant might fly away if the LOC against him is cancelled. This court is not having jurisdiction to cancel LOC issued during investigations, the same is applicable only if LOC is issued during the trial. The issuance of LOC is purely an executive action, to secure the presence of a suspect. Since the court is not vested with any inherent powers the application cannot be entertained. The prosecution prays for rejection of the application.”

Wankhade further argued, “That the accused is a key person working for the main accused who defrauded the banks in multiple crores. The accused was working on a key post for the main accused, an investigation is still going on and in the investigations, there is the involvement of this accused.”

The court while rejecting the plea observed that in this case, it appeared that the investigation was still ongoing. While investigating the officer has found prima facie involvement of the present accused in committing huge fraud. In pursuant to the said involvement of the applicant the investigating officer has issued the LOC, the LOC is not issued by the court but it was issued by the officer. Charge-sheet against the accused is yet to be filed.

 
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all the Breaking News and Latest News from Mumbai. Click here for comprehensive coverage of top Cities including Bengaluru, Delhi, Hyderabad, and more across India along with Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe