...
...
Next Story

Krishna Janmabhoomi cases: Two more applications moved

Monday, two more applications were moved in two of the 11 ongoing cases concerning Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and the Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura.

Published on: May 30, 2022 11:46 PM IST
Advertisement

Two more applications were moved on Monday in two of the ongoing 11 cases on the issue of Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura.

Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura (FILE PHOTO)
Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Eidgah Mosque in Mathura (FILE PHOTO)

July 1, 2022, has already been fixed as next date of hearing in most of the cases filed on the issue and these two applications are also to be taken up on the same day when civil courts resume functioning after summer vacation starting June 1.

One of the petitioners Dinesh Sharma aka Dinesh Kaushik from Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha moved the application in his ongoing case number 174 of 2021—Thakur Keshav Dev Ji Maharaj versus UP Sunni Central Waqf Board and others.

The petitioner, through the application, sought permission to visit the Shahi Eidgah Mosque every day in June along with the DM and the SSP of Mathura to keep an eye on those managing Shahi Eidgah Mosque (claimed by Hindu petitioners to be the “Garbhagriha” of the temple razed by Aurangzeb in 1670).

“While the court would be on a month-long vacation and those at Eidgah Mosque might damage, remove or harm the Hindu signs existing there in mosque. Thus, it is very important to maintain vigil by visiting the mosque once a day and thus application was moved but the court of civil judge (senior division) Mathura found it proper to take up matter on already fixed ate i.e. July 01, 2022,” said Dinesh Kaushik.

“We have moved this application in the light of the order by revision court of additional district Judge (seven) Mathura suggesting early disposal of application. The court of civil judge (senior division) Mathura was pleased to have hearing on application on date fixed i.e. July 01, 2022,” said Rajendra Maheshwari, one of the petitioners and counsel in case.

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Hindustantimes wants to start sending you push notifications. Click allow to subscribe