The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that the violence during the recent student protests in Delhi and across several states warranted a “thorough, fair and impartial” investigation, while directing that all minors arrested during the demonstrations be released immediately and restraining police from taking coercive action against protesting students or making their personal data public.
Track live updates on monsoon session of the Parliament
A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and comprising justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, however, clarified that the interim protection would not extend to "anti-social elements" or persons having criminal antecedents.
Issuing notices to the Union government and the chief secretaries of Delhi, Maharashtra, Bihar, Assam, Kerala, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, the court said allegations of police excesses as well as violence against police personnel required an independent probe.
“The allegations by petitioners make out a prima facie case for an independent probe,” said the bench, adding that the proposed inquiry must also examine complaints by families of injured police personnel.
{{/usCountry}}“The allegations by petitioners make out a prima facie case for an independent probe,” said the bench, adding that the proposed inquiry must also examine complaints by families of injured police personnel.
{{/usCountry}}The order came on a batch of petitions alleging excessive force during protests over the NEET examination controversy, including the July 20 “Sansad Chalo” demonstration in Delhi and subsequent protests in several states.
During the hearing, the bench observed that the protests were constitutionally protected so long as they remained peaceful.
“It was completely a peaceful protest by students raising demands. Such a protest is permissible and protected under the Constitution,” observed the CJI, while cautioning that peaceful demonstrations were often infiltrated by “uninvited guests with agendas”.
“In a peaceful protest there can be uninvited guests with agendas and then they become co-hosts. So why should there not be an independent probe into all of this,” the bench remarked.
The court took note of allegations regarding the use of pellet guns, electric batons, lathi charges, assault on women protesters and media personnel, and claims that police personnel in civilian clothes had participated in violence.
“Use of pellet guns, electric batons and lathi resulting in life-threatening injuries are some of the issues... Excessive use of pellet guns is something that needs to be looked into,” it said.
At the same time, it recognised allegations that more than 200 police personnel had suffered injuries during the protests.
Also read: Police action at CJP protest came after warnings, barricade breaches, heckling: Officials
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre and Delhi Police, said the government had no objection to an independent investigation.
“If students have suffered in any manner, perpetrators have to be brought to book,” submitted Mehta, while also urging that attacks on police officials be investigated. He suggested that anti-social elements may have infiltrated the demonstrations and said he did not believe students themselves would have engaged in violence.
The bench agreed that both narratives required examination.
“There is always a danger of discrediting a peaceful movement,” remarked the bench, adding that a “scientific and evidence-based probe” rather than prima facie conclusions was necessary.
Also read: ‘Removed in error’: Meta on blocking PM Modi's video on Facebook
The court also indicated that it was considering constituting a high-powered committee to investigate incidents beyond Delhi. “We are contemplating a high-powered investigating committee which could also look into incidents of violence outside Delhi,” the bench said.
Significantly, the court also indicated that it may revisit its earlier jurisprudence governing police handling of protests.
“The previous judgments with the passage of time may require some modifications... A time has come to collate all these principles and update them,” emphasised the bench, while inviting stakeholders to suggest changes regarding the permissible use of tear gas and other force-control measures.
As an interim measure, the court directed preservation of CCTV footage, drone recordings, body-worn camera footage, wireless communication records and PCR calls relating to the protests. It also ordered that police preserve digital data of protesters but refrain from releasing any personal information in the public domain.
The matter will now be heard next Monday, when the Centre and the states are expected to place their responses on record.