Sign in

NCERT text book row: Trained lawyer, Indophile, educationist face SC ire

The Supreme Court criticized authors of a withdrawn Class 8 textbook chapter for misrepresenting the judiciary, barring their future involvement.

Published on: Mar 12, 2026, 05:54:39 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

New Delhi: At least one of the people involved in preparing a controversial chapter on the judiciary in a now-withdrawn Class 8 social science textbook holds law degrees from prestigious institutions and served as panel counsel for the Union of India in the apex court, while the others have long been associated with academic and curriculum development work at the national and state-level institutions.

A general view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. (Shrikant Singh)
A general view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. (Shrikant Singh)

The Supreme Court observed on Wednesday that professor Michel Danino, educator Suparna Diwakar and legal researcher Alok Prasanna Kumar “do not have any reasonable knowledge about the Indian judiciary” or they “deliberately and knowingly misrepresented the facts in order to project a negative image of the Indian judiciary before students of class 8 who are at an impressionable age”.

While Danino and Kumar declined to comment, saying the matter is sub judice, Diwakar said she would prefer not to comment at the moment.

Here is a brief profile of the three members barred by the apex court from participating in the book development process:

Alok Prasanna Kumar: Kumar is a former co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, a Delhi-based independent think tank engaged in legal research. After completing his undergraduate law degree from the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law, Hyderabad in 2008, he obtained a Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) from the University of Oxford in 2009. He has also practised in the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court from the chambers of Mohan Parasaran, former Solicitor General of India.

Michel Danino: He is the chairperson of the Curriculum Area Group (CAG) responsible for developing NCERT’s social science textbooks. Born in France in 1956, Danino studied physics and engineering before moving to India in 1977, inspired by Indian philosopher and yogi Sri Aurobindo. Since then, he has been engaged in research and writing on Indian civilization. Danino was awarded the Padma Shri in 2017 for his contributions to literature and education.

Suparna Diwakar: Diwakar is an educationist and currently serves as a board member at the School of Inspired Leadership (SOIL), a business school in Gurugram. She is also the former founder of the Noida-based Indian School of Development Management (ISDM), which offers leadership programmes for the social sector. According to her LinkedIn profile, she served as chief consultant with the National Syllabus and Teaching Learning Material Committee of NCERT between July 2023 and January 2026. She was also involved in designing the National Curriculum Framework (NCF) between August 2022 and July 2023.

Officials at both the NCERT and the Union education ministry told HT that they “will adhere to the court orders,” without commenting on whether any action would be initiated against the three.

  • Sanjay Maurya
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Sanjay Maurya

    Sanjay Maurya is a Principal Correspondent with Hindustan Times, where he covers education, with a focus on school and higher education, competitive examinations, education policy and governance. Working as part of the National Bureau, he is based in New Delhi and reports on the Ministry of Education and covers various statutory bodies like UGC, AICTE and NCTE and autonomous bodies like CBSE and NCERT. His reporting also tracks the implementation of key government reforms and policies from school education to higher education including in IITs, NITs, IIMs, central and state universities, and their impact on students and educational institutions. His reporting on the irregularities and rushed implementation of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for evaluation of Class 12 board exams 2026, triggered administrative action, leading to the transfer of the board's two senior-most officials and the constitution of a committee to probe alleged irregularities in procurement process of the system. He joined Hindustan Times in December 2024. Prior to that, he had a three-year stint at Careers360, where he reported on school and higher education, entrance examinations, admissions, rankings and various education policies involving universities and professional education bodies. Over the years, Maurya has reported extensively on major developments in India's education sector, including the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, changes in school education, higher education regulation, and the evolution of entrance examinations such as NEET, JEE and CUET. He regularly produces data-driven and explanatory stories based on government documents, parliamentary proceedings, court records and official data. His focus remains on helping readers understand how education policies and institutional decisions affect millions of students, teachers and educational institutions across the country.Read More

Get the latest India News, breaking headlines and real-time updates from across the country. Stay informed about politics, government policies, crime, weather major national developments and Karnataka Bandh LIVE.