US trade court blocks Donald Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs under emergency-powers law
A panel of three judges at the Court of International Trade ruled that Donald Trump didn’t have the legal right to make such broad tariff changes on his own.
A US federal trade court has stopped President Donald Trump from imposing new tariffs on imported goods, saying that he went beyond the powers given to him by law, reported the news agency AFP.

The case was about the tariffs Trump announced on 2 April. These tariffs would have added a 10% tax on most imports, with even higher taxes on goods from China and the European Union. He called this plan “Liberation Day.” Later, he paused some of the higher tariffs while trying to make deals with other countries.
However, on Wednesday, a panel of three judges at the New York-based Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had no legal right to make such broad tariff changes on his own.
“An unlimited delegation of tariff authority would constitute an improper abdication of legislative power to another branch of government,” the judges wrote in their decision.
The court said Congress never gave the president unlimited power to raise tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA), the law Trump used to justify his actions.
The IEEPA gives the president the power to take economic action in an emergency, especially when there is a serious threat.
Meanwhile, the court observed that allowing any president to use the IEEPA to set any tariffs he wants would go against the Constitution.
“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the court said, reported the Associated Press.
The decision is a severe legal blow to Trump’s approach to trade, especially as this is only the fourth month of his second term. Legal experts expect the ruling to be appealed, possibly to the US Supreme Court.
What the Trump administration argued
Trump had claimed that trade deficits and issues like drug trafficking were national emergencies, giving him the right to act without Congress. He used tariffs to pressure other countries into making trade deals favouring the US, saying they would bring back jobs and reduce the federal deficit.
White House spokesperson Kush Desai argued, “Trade deficits are a national emergency that has decimated American communities, left our workers behind, and weakened our defence industrial base — facts that the court did not dispute.”
Kush Desai added that the administration would use all executive powers to “restore American Greatness.”
His administration claimed similar actions by President Richard Nixon in 1971 were allowed, and argued that only Congress, not the courts, should decide whether a national emergency exists.
The case was brought by small businesses, including a wine importer called VOS Selections, whose owner said the tariffs threaten to shut down his company. A group of states, led by Oregon, also joined the lawsuit.
Trump is facing at least seven lawsuits over the tariffs. The people and groups suing him say the emergency powers law doesn’t allow the president to use it to place tariffs.
They also argue that even if it did, a trade deficit isn’t a real emergency, since the US has had a trade deficit with other countries for 49 years in a row.
Trump’s tariffs affected nearly every country, including the allies of the US, like Canada and Mexico.
ABOUT THE AUTHORHT News DeskFollow the latest breaking news, major developments and agenda-setting stories from India and around the world with the newsdesk at Hindustan Times. Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs. The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals. The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments. Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources. Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available. Whether covering a key political decision in New Delhi, an economic policy shift affecting millions, a landmark court ruling or a major global event, the HT News Desk aims to provide readers with reliable, fact-based journalism that delivers not only the latest developments but also the context and analysis needed to understand their wider implications.Read More

E-Paper


