Sign in

India must lift ban on social media in Kashmir, it impacts fundamental rights: UN

On April 17, the government banned 22 social media sites and applications, including Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp, in an attempt to stop people in Kashmir from spreading rumours and uploading controversial videos.

Updated on: May 11, 2017, 17:28:21 IST
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

India must immediately revoke a ban on social media in Jammu and Kashmir to guarantee freedom of expression and seek a lasting solution to the decades-long conflict through democratic dialogue, the United Nations said on Thursday.

A Kashmiri man browses the internet on his mobile phone on a footbridge in Srinagar. A statement released and published by the UN high commissioner for human rights said the social media gag was a “collective punishment” that didn’t meet the international standards for limiting free speech. (AFP file)
A Kashmiri man browses the internet on his mobile phone on a footbridge in Srinagar. A statement released and published by the UN high commissioner for human rights said the social media gag was a “collective punishment” that didn’t meet the international standards for limiting free speech. (AFP file)

A statement released and published by the UN high commissioner for human rights said the gag was a “collective punishment” that didn’t meet the international standards for limiting free speech.

“The scope of these restrictions has a significantly disproportionate impact on the fundamental rights of everyone in Kashmir, undermining the government’s stated aim of preventing dissemination of information that could lead to violence,” the report, authored by two UN human rights experts, said.

Anger has mounted in the Valley in recent months over a series of viral videos showing alleged human rights excesses by security forces, including a Kashmiri man tied to an army jeep.

Hundreds of students and local residents have clashed with police and army personnel, a string of banks have been looted and stone pelting incidents have increased.

On April 17, the government banned 22 social media sites and applications, including Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp, in an attempt to stop people from spreading rumours and uploading controversial videos. But the ban has been largely ineffective as residents have circumvented the gag using virtual private networks (VPNs).

The report said there were already an estimated 31 reported cases of social media and internet bans since 2012 in Jammu and Kashmir, noting what seems to be a worrying pattern aimed at curbing protests and social unrest in the region.

The experts noted that in 2016, the UN Human Rights Council condemned such disruptions and called upon states to avoid them.

“Denying such access disrupts the free exchange of ideas and the ability of individuals to connect with one another and associate peacefully on matters of shared concern,” said the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Michel Forst.

The report noted a ban on mobile internet -- 3G and 4G data services – which were restored last month after a brief disruption.

  • Dhrubo Jyoti
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Dhrubo Jyoti

    Dhrubo Jyoti is Deputy Executive Editor at Hindustan Times, where they help oversee the newspaper’s daily news and opinion coverage. They are part of the leadership team of the newspaper and their daily responsibilities include news selection, commissioning and editing, apart from planning and executing special projects. Apart from this, they write on national affairs at the intersection of caste and sexuality, with a focus on elections, politics and the lifeworlds of the caste marginalised. Formally trained in physics from St. Xavier’s College, Kolkata and Bose Institute, Kolkata, they made a switch to studying journalism from the Asian College of Journalism in Chennai. Over the past decade at Hindustan Times, they have worked at the National Desk, Page 1 team, Integrated Copy Desk and Special Stories Team, before running the opinion page as views editor for two years, and then moving back as Senior Editor of News Operations. In the past 12 years, they have reported on numerous national and state elections, specialising on caste-informed coverage of major moments in India’s history, and focussing on leading investigations into government accountability and social inequities. Their narrative non-fiction work aims to put Dalit voices at the core of India’s LGBTQIA+ movements.Read More