In a cheque bounce case, the Chandigarh district court has awarded one-year rigourous imprisonment to a Panchkula man. The convict, Ashok Mittal of Sector 4, Panchkula, has also been directed to pay ₹2 crore — double the loaned amount — to complainant Ashwani Anand, 60, of Sector 7, Panchkula.
In another case of cheque bounce filed by Anand’s wife Ashima, the court ,only a few days ago, had directed Mittal to pay her ₹1 crore (also double the actual amount).
In his complaint, Anand had claimed that he was a member of kitties which were organised and run by the accused and his wife Chetna Mittal. In July 2014, Mittal had borrowed ₹15 lakh and ₹50 lakh from him and returned the amount, while also paying an interest on the sums.
Anand said Mittal once again requested a financial help of ₹50 lakh as friendly loan and returned the amount via a cheque in September 2014. However the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds in the account.
Since Mittal was aware that Anand had ₹75 lakh in cash, which he received on maturity of kitties, he asked him for a loan of ₹1 crore. Advocate Ramesh Bamal said that Anand agreed to loan him ₹1 crore, and in discharge of his admitted and existed liability, Mittal issued multiple cheques for the total of ₹1 crore drawn on Bank of India, Panchkula. When Anand tried to encash the cheques, they were returned unpaid due to insufficient funds in December 2014.
{{/usCountry}}Since Mittal was aware that Anand had ₹75 lakh in cash, which he received on maturity of kitties, he asked him for a loan of ₹1 crore. Advocate Ramesh Bamal said that Anand agreed to loan him ₹1 crore, and in discharge of his admitted and existed liability, Mittal issued multiple cheques for the total of ₹1 crore drawn on Bank of India, Panchkula. When Anand tried to encash the cheques, they were returned unpaid due to insufficient funds in December 2014.
{{/usCountry}}Hence, Anands moved court and filed a case against Ashok Mittal.
The court observed that the convict has committed a serious offence which is required to be dealt strictly, and he deserves no leniency. He is to pay the amount within a month of expiry of period prescribed for appeal.