Rights versus duties: the debate goes on
Rights and duties go hand in hand. One's right becomes another's duty and vice-versa. Out of the two which takes precedence is always a point of debate. The rights and duties which are indispensable for a man being part and parcel of society have been enshrined in the Constitution as the Fundamental Rights and Duties. The Constitution covers a broad spectrum of domains to protect the rights of the common man by introducing six rights as Fundamental Rights.
These are Right to Equality, Right to Freedom, Right to Freedom of Religion, Cultural and Educational Rights, Right against Exploitation, and Right to Constitutional Remedies. Similarly, the Fundamental Duties are also emphasised upon by the Constitution.
After Independence, the emphasis was primarily on duties. 'Country first, self afterwards', 'What can you do for the country, and not what the country can do for you?', and 'Service before self' are the adages that emanate from the principle of duties. The principle of duties insulated the minds of Indian polity for more than six decades and kept the citizens of India tolerant and non-vocal towards the deficiencies and failures of the government to provide basic amenities of life to the common man.
During the past three to four years, many rights have got legal sanction by way of amendment in the Constitution and separate enactment by Parliament, namely Right to Food, Right to Education, and Right to Employment. There is another right which is in the form of 'Street Hawkers Bill' pending in Parliament.
Now the question arises as to who is duty-bound to implement these rights. Clearly, it is the government that is duty-bound to implement these, or it is the government against whom these rights are to be endorsed. Thus all these rights will bind the government constitutionally to do its duty to which it is otherwise morally/politically duty-bound. In other words, it is also admission of the failure on the part of the government in performing the duties of a welfare state.
The UPA government has enacted these rights without financial closure. Education is in the concurrent list, where both the Centre and state can enact laws. The effect of the Right to Education Act passed by the Centre will be felt by the state exchequer as most of the states are financially starved and the Centre has not made any extra financial provisions in the Central budget to set off the additional fiscal burden to be borne by state governments for infrastructure and establishments. Similarly, to implement the Right to Food, the Centre will have to depend on the Public Distribution System (PDS), which is full of deficiencies.
Had the Centre plugged the pilfering points in the PDS and developed a mechanism of utilisation of buffer stock of foodgrain within its shelf-life span, there would have been no need to make the law of Right to Food. The Street Hawkers Bill will give the right to street hawkers to be implemented against the municipal bodies. Is the UPA government not encroaching upon the domain of the local government? Will it not demolish the three-tier system of governance -- Central, state and local government?
The Ramayana and Mahabharata depict different pictures of Indian society at different periods of time. The Ramayana depicts the duty-bound society where everyone, from the king to the general public, prefers duties to rights and had a peaceful living even at odd times. On the other hand, Mahabharata delineates the rights-based society where everyone, from the king to the general public, prefers rights to duties and everybody demands their respective rights. Consequently, everybody went restless which culminated in a great war.
Is the UPA government converting society into a rights-based one? What kind of Bharat will be delivered to the future generation -- intolerant, restless, selfish India, caring only for rights and not for duties? Will the land of Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi be able to give the world the message of peace and brotherhood in future? Why can't the corrective measures be taken with regard to the functioning of the government by performing its duty properly instead of giving a legal shape to a right? Introspect lest it should be too late.
Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has directed all sports facilities under his government to remain open for sportspersons till 10pm. The Aam Aadmi Party said on its official Twitter handle that the decision will allow athletes and players to practice till night. The order came after a report by The Indian Express which claimed the athletes and coaches were being forced to wrap the training at Delhi government-run Thyagraj Stadium earlier than the usual time.
Uttar Pradesh finance minister Suresh Khanna on Friday presented the first budget of the Yogi Adityanath government in its second term in the Legislative Assembly. Read here for live updates of the Budget The FM proposed a provision of ₹523.34 crore for the implementation of the scheme in Lucknow, Gautam Budh Nagar, Agra, Varanasi, Gorakhpur and Prayagraj for the safety of women under the Safe City scheme.
The Central Bureau of Investigation is conducting raids at residences of former Jharkhand sports minister Bandhu Tirkey in connection with financial irregularities in conducting the 34th National Games in 2011, people aware of the development said. Tirkey, who joined the Congress in 2020 and was appointed as working president of Jharkhand Congress last year, is in national capital Delhi for party meetings, an aide in his office said.
The Enforcement Directorate on Thursday conducted searches at about seven places in Mumbai, Pune and Ratnagiri district's Dapoli linked to a close confidant of chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, Maharashtra transport minister Anil Parab. Parab was under ED scanner ever since dismissed Mumbai police officer Sachin Vaze, the prime accused in Antilia explosives scare and Mansukh Hiran murder case, alleged that Anil Parab was among the recipients of bribes.
The Bharatiya Janata Party will attend an all-party meeting Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar has convened on June 1 to discuss the modalities for a state-level caste census even as it has faced criticism from its ruling National Democratic Alliance allies for trying to stall the exercise. On May 10, Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav threatened to hold a foot march from Patna to Delhi in case the census is not conducted.